| 03:25.06 | *** join/#neo900 b1101 (~b@fsf/member/b1101) |
| 04:10.01 | *** join/#neo900 Wikiwide (~chatzilla@CPE-121-211-246-141.hhui7.cht.bigpond.net.au) |
| 04:11.33 | Wikiwide | <PROTECTED> |
| 05:33.53 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 05:36.01 | jonwil | Will Neo900 include fingerprint reader or any other biometric sensor? I am hoping it wont, those things are insecure. |
| 05:42.48 | wpwrak | it will have a great number of sensors that can gather information that is both biometric and highly personal if not embarrassing. e.g., it will have microphones that will record your voice with fiendishly high accuracy. and all the "adult" self-portraits you'll snap with the built-on cameras, well ... |
| 05:43.11 | wpwrak | but no, no fingerprint reader. unless you leave a print on one of the cameras :) |
| 05:44.01 | jonwil | Good that it wont be following (cr)apple and using biuometrics to protect the phone, especially in light of http://www.macrumors.com/2014/10/31/fingerprints-not-protected-by-fifth-amendment/ |
| 05:44.50 | wpwrak | btw, "insecure" is relative. if people use, say, a fingerprint reader, to protect something they could not be inconvenienced to protect otherwise, then that insecure device still improves overall security |
| 05:45.04 | jonwil | true |
| 05:45.22 | jonwil | but a password is better than a fingerprint reader given how easy it is to fool fingerprint readers ( |
| 05:46.20 | wpwrak | as long as you can get people to not make if "asdf" or something else from those top 10 ;-) |
| 05:50.54 | wpwrak | (top10) i suppose you've seen this one ? http://zed0.co.uk/crossword/ |
| 06:38.03 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 07:59.58 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-collins (~paulk@gagarine.paulk.fr) |
| 08:36.44 | *** join/#neo900 kolp (~quassel@55d44466.access.ecotel.net) |
| 08:43.23 | *** join/#neo900 Defiant (~Defiant@cl-1962.ham-01.de.sixxs.net) |
| 08:43.59 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-collins (~paulk@gagarine.paulk.fr) |
| 08:56.02 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik (~quassel@239.238.138.88.rev.sfr.net) |
| 10:10.07 | *** join/#neo900 Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
| 10:15.00 | *** join/#neo900 norly (~norly@enpas.org) |
| 11:01.14 | *** join/#neo900 Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
| 11:03.21 | DocScrutinizer05 | seven (7) donations per money transfer in September, total of ~900EUR |
| 11:03.38 | DocScrutinizer05 | err October |
| 11:07.11 | DocScrutinizer05 | five (5) direct donations per money transfer in September, ~2600EUR thanks to Oksana |
| 11:35.10 | *** join/#neo900 Sveta (quasselcor@freenode/staff/fsf.member.svetlana) |
| 11:37.26 | DocScrutinizer05 | PP Sep http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopKE1874.png |
| 11:38.50 | DocScrutinizer05 | PP Oct broken http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopZw1874.png |
| 11:41.13 | DocScrutinizer05 | anyway this seems correct for Oct: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/11/01/plasma-desktopLb1874.png |
| 11:43.07 | *** join/#neo900 che1 (~che@g159.tum.vpn.lrz.de) |
| 11:51.13 | *** join/#neo900 Sveta (noone@freenode/staff/fsf.member.svetlana) |
| 15:09.01 | DocScrutinizer05 | so 5 + 18 new device reservations in Sep, 7 + 13 in Oct |
| 15:10.04 | DocScrutinizer05 | = 43 total in Sep 1. .. Oct 30. |
| 15:17.41 | jake42 | quite a number :-) |
| 15:27.48 | DocScrutinizer05 | actually it's 2 more since oksana's counts as 3 |
| 15:47.31 | *** join/#neo900 arcean (~arcean@aadd211.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) |
| 16:02.24 | *** join/#neo900 unclouded (~neil@2001:4428:200:80fc:7e05:7ff:fe0d:d421) |
| 16:15.03 | *** join/#neo900 Nokiabot (~Nokiabot@223.179.137.207) |
| 16:17.13 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-collins (~paulk@gagarine.paulk.fr) |
| 17:22.30 | *** join/#neo900 vakkov (~vakkov@s3n104.brunel.ac.uk) |
| 17:37.16 | *** join/#neo900 freemangordon (~ivo@46.249.74.23) |
| 17:44.40 | *** join/#neo900 arcean (~arcean@aadd211.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) |
| 17:54.48 | *** join/#neo900 b1101 (~b@fsf/member/b1101) |
| 18:44.49 | *** join/#neo900 che1 (~che@g162.tum.vpn.lrz.de) |
| 18:50.20 | *** join/#neo900 b1101 (~b@fsf/member/b1101) |
| 19:24.08 | *** join/#neo900 nox- (noident@freebsd/developer/nox) |
| 20:06.53 | *** join/#neo900 finder111 (b2bf8d30@gateway/web/freenode/ip.178.191.141.48) |
| 20:08.13 | *** join/#neo900 finder111_ (b2bf8d30@gateway/web/freenode/ip.178.191.141.48) |
| 20:28.25 | *** join/#neo900 vakkov (~vakkov@134.83.207.39) |
| 20:38.01 | *** join/#neo900 norly (~norly@enpas.org) |
| 20:51.09 | *** join/#neo900 che1 (~che@p5B0705A3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 21:23.59 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 22:18.24 | freemangordon | jonwil: stupid, am I :) https://gitorious.org/pulseaudio-nokia/pulseaudio-nokia/commit/b588351f28356b7856701d0bd368f514b2630bef |
| 22:19.12 | jonwil | xo does record work now? |
| 22:20.22 | freemangordon | still not, but the output from stock and foss mudrc_process (given the same input) matches |
| 22:20.36 | freemangordon | so eap is 100% functional |
| 22:21.05 | jonwil | ok, great |
| 22:21.45 | freemangordon | for 2 MiB samples |
| 22:23.20 | freemangordon | seems there is something elase, in the PA stuff |
| 22:23.24 | freemangordon | *else |
| 22:24.35 | wpwrak | freemangordon: so it was pointer mixup in the end ? |
| 22:24.49 | wpwrak | (the gain mystery) |
| 22:24.55 | freemangordon | or rather paramters mixup |
| 22:25.03 | wpwrak | same effect :) |
| 22:25.04 | freemangordon | naah, the gain mistery is still there |
| 22:25.27 | wpwrak | maybe more of the same then ? |
| 22:25.50 | freemangordon | no, I guess 2MiB of samples would trigger it |
| 22:26.06 | freemangordon | maybe gcc -O3 plays it smart |
| 22:26.11 | jonwil | if all the functions in EAP are verified as working the same stock vs extra, maybe try the drc functions and see |
| 22:26.17 | freemangordon | won't be the first time |
| 22:26.35 | freemangordon | jonwil: look at the backscroll :) |
| 22:26.49 | freemangordon | "still not, but the output from stock and foss mudrc_process (given the same input) matches" |
| 22:26.54 | jonwil | oh ok |
| 22:27.13 | jonwil | weird then |
| 22:27.29 | freemangordon | that finctions gets left and right channel inputs and produces l/r outputs |
| 22:27.45 | freemangordon | those match for 2MiB samples |
| 22:28.05 | freemangordon | but recorded video still hase werid sound |
| 22:28.08 | freemangordon | *has |
| 22:29.12 | jonwil | well I am stumped |
| 22:29.15 | freemangordon | it could be something in set_drc_volume or in mumdrc_write_parameters |
| 22:29.30 | jonwil | possible, try stock of both |
| 22:30.08 | freemangordon | this is what I use to test it http://pastebin.com/HbCaWzfe |
| 22:31.51 | freemangordon | both outputs and (most of) the internal structures match |
| 22:33.15 | jonwil | no idea on my end what to do next... |
| 22:34.22 | freemangordon | jonwil: I will look at how are mudrc functions called in the -record module |
| 22:34.29 | jonwil | ok |
| 22:34.36 | freemangordon | you could do the same as well :) |
| 22:34.48 | freemangordon | jonwil: or... |
| 22:35.23 | jonwil | I cant do anything today, I am busy :) |
| 22:35.32 | freemangordon | get that code from pastebin and confirm I am not doing something stupid and the outputs really match |
| 22:35.44 | freemangordon | oh, I didn;t mean today :) |
| 22:35.58 | jonwil | ok |
| 22:36.01 | freemangordon | ... |
| 22:36.12 | freemangordon | or invent your own test cases |
| 22:36.35 | freemangordon | hoever, I am going afk :) |
| 22:36.40 | freemangordon | night guys |
| 23:10.55 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik_ (~quassel@239.238.138.88.rev.sfr.net) |
| 23:44.11 | *** join/#neo900 vakkov (~vakkov@s3n104.brunel.ac.uk) |
| 23:59.18 | *** join/#neo900 norly (~norly@enpas.org) |
| 23:59.40 | *** join/#neo900 norly (~norly@enpas.org) |
