| 00:17.35 | houkime | seems like sensors page needs rechecking decoupler-wise. |
| 00:21.30 | *** join/#neo900 infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 00:21.30 | *** topic/#neo900 is http://neo900.org | CCCAMP15 lightning talks at http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ - major: http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ccc2015talk/neo900-wpwrak_CCC2015.webm | conversations are logged to http://infobot.rikers.org/%23neo900/ and http://irclog.whitequark.org/neo900 | Latest news: http://neo900.org/news/joerg-pia-2018-03-01 |
| 00:21.30 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v infobot] by ChanServ |
| 00:22.26 | houkime | often like smb thought it is a good idea to decouple pins in separate parts of IC using only one decoupler for them all. |
| 00:24.27 | houkime | although maybe it can be done in some cases using the other side of the board, |
| 00:25.03 | houkime | it doesn't seem like it is always possible/good solution. |
| 00:28.23 | houkime | esp when you have 1v8 and 2v7 rails |
| 00:39.49 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@85.159.233.219) |
| 01:52.33 | *** join/#neo900 pkircher (~pkircher@unaffiliated/pkircher) |
| 02:01.34 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 02:54.24 | *** join/#neo900 craftyguy (~craftyguy@qutebrowser/dev/craftyguy) |
| 03:44.26 | *** join/#neo900 knttl (~knttl@p54B7E04D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 04:41.15 | *** join/#neo900 xmn (~xmn@172.58.232.32) |
| 07:34.41 | *** join/#neo900 Kero_ (~kero@f135090.upc-f.chello.nl) |
| 07:57.36 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik (~kabouik@158.38.1.70) |
| 08:04.25 | *** join/#neo900 himcesjf_ (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf) |
| 08:39.29 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@200116b82af998006a05cafffe0f7407.dip.versatel-1u1.de) |
| 09:17.10 | *** join/#neo900 how900 (~Neo900@chat.dyne.org) |
| 09:17.10 | *** join/#neo900 how900 (~Neo900@neo900/coreteam/communications/how) |
| 09:17.10 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v how900] by ChanServ |
| 10:27.10 | *** join/#neo900 chomwitt (~chomwitt@2a02:587:dc0d:6600:ac63:8e1:a7ba:7e1e) |
| 11:03.29 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok__ (~Jabawok__@203.63.218.57) |
| 11:16.32 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok_ (~Jabawok__@203.63.25.98) |
| 11:33.52 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109.252.86.188) |
| 12:09.22 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok__ (~Jabawok__@220-245-201-36.tpgi.com.au) |
| 12:18.54 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok_ (~Jabawok__@58.84.109.17) |
| 13:08.54 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok__ (~Jabawok__@203.63.227.138) |
| 13:14.21 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok_ (~Jabawok__@27-33-145-143.tpgi.com.au) |
| 13:25.27 | *** join/#neo900 _Chris_ (~Chris@p4FCA0A8A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 14:05.37 | *** join/#neo900 jabawok__ (~Jabawok__@14-203-178-217.tpgi.com.au) |
| 14:06.11 | *** join/#neo900 him-cesjf (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf) |
| 14:10.46 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 14:54.57 | *** join/#neo900 trx (ns-team@cable-188-2-25-100.dynamic.sbb.rs) |
| 14:54.57 | *** join/#neo900 trx (ns-team@devbin/founder/trx) |
| 15:23.35 | *** join/#neo900 ravelo (uid244116@neo900/community/supporter/ravelo) |
| 15:52.16 | *** join/#neo900 Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
| 16:58.33 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik- (~kabouik@236.34.200.37.customer.cdi.no) |
| 17:22.32 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@i59F77FAE.versanet.de) |
| 17:23.25 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109-252-86-188.nat.spd-mgts.ru) |
| 17:50.34 | *** join/#neo900 chomwitt (~chomwitt@2a02:587:dc0d:6600:ac63:8e1:a7ba:7e1e) |
| 17:54.23 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik (~kabouik@176.67.168.147) |
| 18:33.51 | *** join/#neo900 drrty (drrty@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/drrty) |
| 18:36.55 | houkime | what are the requirements for IR placing& |
| 18:37.00 | houkime | ? |
| 18:37.21 | houkime | receiver and transmitter should probably be together. |
| 18:37.38 | houkime | they should be on the edge |
| 18:38.03 | houkime | they should be on the upper surface of LOWEr so that they are facing spacerframe |
| 18:38.28 | houkime | anything else? |
| 19:23.20 | atk | houkime: there's a window on the N900 for the IR |
| 19:23.26 | atk | so it has to line up with the window |
| 19:23.36 | atk | I can't remember if the window has a divider but that might also matter |
| 19:33.05 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 19:41.41 | Joerg-Neo900 | there's a whitepaper covering all |
| 19:41.58 | Joerg-Neo900 | ir.pdf iirc |
| 19:47.54 | Joerg-Neo900 | http://neo900.org/stuff/papers/ir.pdf#15 |
| 19:52.33 | Joerg-Neo900 | houkime: ^ |
| 19:52.59 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@200116b82a2abe006a05cafffe0f7407.dip.versatel-1u1.de) |
| 19:53.15 | houkime | thx |
| 19:54.04 | *** join/#neo900 illwieckz (~illwieckz@unvanquished/developer/illwieckz) |
| 19:56.44 | *** join/#neo900 illwieckz (~illwieckz@unvanquished/developer/illwieckz) |
| 20:22.32 | houkime | what is rationale behind having 2 battery fuel gauges btw? |
| 20:35.50 | Joerg-Neo900 | one for legacy, one for best performance |
| 20:36.18 | Joerg-Neo900 | the bq27200 is suboptimal |
| 20:36.44 | Joerg-Neo900 | but needed for 100& maemo compatibility |
| 20:36.50 | Joerg-Neo900 | 100% even |
| 20:37.14 | Joerg-Neo900 | BME is one of the closed parts that are not exactly easy to replace |
| 20:56.14 | sixwheeledbeast^ | did bme-replacement become usable? |
| 21:15.48 | Joerg-Neo900 | well, sort of |
| 22:05.16 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 23:21.12 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109.252.86.188) |