| 00:02.27 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 00:19.25 | *** join/#neo900 infobot (ibot@208.53.50.136) |
| 00:19.25 | *** topic/#neo900 is http://neo900.org | CCCAMP15 lightning talks at http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ - major: http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ccc2015talk/neo900-wpwrak_CCC2015.webm | conversations are logged to http://infobot.rikers.org/%23neo900/ and http://irclog.whitequark.org/neo900 | Latest news: http://neo900.org/news/joerg-pia-2018-03-01 |
| 00:19.25 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v infobot] by ChanServ |
| 03:07.19 | *** join/#neo900 knttl (~knttl@p54B7E259.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 03:50.27 | *** join/#neo900 pagurus (~user@i59F7CA86.versanet.de) |
| 03:59.22 | *** join/#neo900 himcesjf_ (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf) |
| 04:04.33 | *** join/#neo900 knttl (~knttl@p54A53D9F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 04:07.49 | *** join/#neo900 ravelo (uid244116@neo900/community/supporter/ravelo) |
| 04:11.09 | ravelo | Joerg-Neo900: thanks for explaining |
| 04:11.16 | ravelo | Read it now |
| 04:18.48 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 04:30.29 | *** join/#neo900 him-cesjf (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf) |
| 04:32.59 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@i59F77F16.versanet.de) |
| 08:05.55 | Joerg-Neo900 | juts for correctness: there _are_ situations where you simply can't route stuff - when you need to connect 3 chips of 3*3cm each with traces none longer than 6mm - we don't have any such situation on Neo900 |
| 08:06.53 | Joerg-Neo900 | at least not in proto_v2 |
| 08:21.31 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 08:40.34 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 09:03.59 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@195.123.219.207) |
| 09:20.51 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 09:27.38 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 09:50.42 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@195.123.219.207) |
| 10:01.49 | DocScrutinizer05 | didn't know I got an alter ego out there: http://www.aptosid.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=18161&sid=ea75004f3c8edfb5154546e87e64f1e6#18161 |
| 10:03.35 | DocScrutinizer05 | I'm afraid my experience will be exactly the same |
| 10:17.45 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 10:25.26 | Joerg-Neo900 | I wonder how >>an sd card holder on the other side of BoB<< is a problem for placing connectors |
| 10:26.14 | Joerg-Neo900 | I mean, neither the B2B conns nor the uSD holder are through-hole components |
| 10:33.46 | *** join/#neo900 Chris__ (~Chris@p4FCA02E7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 10:39.32 | Joerg-Neo900 | btw regarding layers needed, we discussed this quite a while ago already, with one of our prospect layouters that then failed to pick up on the task. Seeing the density (ratio of footprints area vs total available area) being very high, they assumed we might need 5 layers instead of 4 for LOWER |
| 10:40.14 | Joerg-Neo900 | actually 6 layers |
| 10:43.05 | Joerg-Neo900 | as a general rule, layouters should start with overprovisioning of layers and try to use as few layers as possible during routing. Then eventually you see how many layers you really need, maybe redo a few details that have a peak in layers needed to reduce layer count there, and as a final step you simply delete the unused layers from PCB config |
| 11:17.49 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik- (~kabouik@38.ip-37-187-46.eu) |
| 11:29.31 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109.252.86.188) |
| 12:27.24 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 13:11.39 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 14:06.32 | *** join/#neo900 xmn (~xman@24.215.244.87) |
| 14:49.53 | *** join/#neo900 ArturShaik (~artur-sha@212.112.100.88) |
| 14:50.08 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 16:28.44 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@200116b82a2abb006a05cafffe0f7407.dip.versatel-1u1.de) |
| 16:40.13 | *** join/#neo900 xes (~xes@unaffiliated/xes) |
| 16:52.26 | *** join/#neo900 him-cesjf (~cesjf@unaffiliated/himcesjf) |
| 17:19.35 | *** join/#neo900 louisdk (~louisdk@static-5-103-138-205.ip.fibianet.dk) |
| 17:23.25 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109-252-86-188.nat.spd-mgts.ru) |
| 18:20.49 | *** join/#neo900 Kabouik_ (~kabouik@115.ip-91-134-138.eu) |
| 18:33.40 | *** join/#neo900 neo900 (~office@neo900/coreteam/joerg) |
| 18:33.41 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v Joerg-Neo900] by ChanServ |
| 18:33.45 | *** join/#neo900 DocScrutinizer05 (~saturn@openmoko/engineers/joerg) |
| 18:33.45 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v DocScrutinizer05] by ChanServ |
| 18:35.28 | *** join/#neo900 wpwrak (~werner@74-26-17-190.fibertel.com.ar) |
| 18:35.28 | *** mode/#neo900 [+v wpwrak] by ChanServ |
| 18:42.43 | *** join/#neo900 jonsger (~Thunderbi@200116b82a2abb006a05cafffe0f7407.dip.versatel-1u1.de) |
| 18:49.21 | *** join/#neo900 drrty (drrty@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/drrty) |
| 18:49.35 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109-252-86-188.nat.spd-mgts.ru) |
| 19:08.16 | *** join/#neo900 Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
| 19:19.12 | *** join/#neo900 illwieckz (~illwieckz@unvanquished/developer/illwieckz) |
| 19:36.37 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-gagarine (~paulk-gag@220.107.128.77.rev.sfr.net) |
| 19:45.13 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-gagarine-s (~paulk-gag@220.107.128.77.rev.sfr.net) |
| 20:11.40 | *** join/#neo900 paulk-gagarine (~paulk-gag@220.107.128.77.rev.sfr.net) |
| 22:10.25 | *** join/#neo900 jonwil (~jonwil@27-33-80-219.tpgi.com.au) |
| 22:50.36 | *** join/#neo900 houkime (~houkime@109-252-86-188.nat.spd-mgts.ru) |
| 23:37.01 | galiven | houkime: http://projects.goldelico.com/p/neo900/timeline/all/ has an atom link, though the most reent entries are July 2017. There's nothing on neo900.org that looks like a bugtracker link to that though. |