| 01:20.27 | *** join/#picogui Xentac (~xentac@amga45cyy30x9.bc.hsia.telus.net) |
| 05:51.25 | *** join/#picogui gonk2 (~brandon@h-68-164-110-57.DNVTCO56.covad.net) |
| 09:13.18 | *** join/#picogui TD (~mike@81-6-220-138.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk) |
| 10:38.27 | TD | scanline: is xfree hooked up to CIA? |
| 10:46.43 | scanline | it should be |
| 10:47.39 | scanline | there was an xfree commit today according to the mail logs |
| 10:47.54 | scanline | well, yesterday I guess |
| 10:47.58 | scanline | and according to the stats page too |
| 10:47.59 | scanline | :p |
| 10:48.20 | scanline | guess they just really don't commit that often |
| 10:48.37 | scanline | and the commit they had yesterday had no description |
| 10:49.04 | scanline | ah, that's the filter's fault... the commit should have said "A few I2C-related cleanups" |
| 10:49.13 | scanline | still, an amazingly tiny amount of traffic for such a big project |
| 10:50.23 | TD | hmm |
| 10:50.26 | TD | heh |
| 10:50.47 | TD | they seem to be coasting now keithp left |
| 10:51.03 | TD | apparently xrandr actually broke stuff, and from reading the mailing list it seems they don't intend to fix it |
| 10:51.12 | scanline | ooh, fun |
| 10:51.15 | TD | as he got kicked out before he could finish the work |
| 10:57.15 | TD | scanline: are you a vim or emacs guy? or neither? |
| 10:57.21 | TD | #emacs is dead at the moment |
| 10:57.51 | scanline | I use emacs, but I'm not an emacs fanatic |
| 10:58.02 | scanline | one of those "I'll learn elisp eventually" folks |
| 10:58.05 | TD | do you know how to make font locking not suck speedwise? |
| 10:58.10 | TD | hehe. join the club :) |
| 10:58.23 | scanline | hmm.. I haven't had any problems with font lock speed, but then I'm on a pretty fast machine |
| 10:58.34 | scanline | I try to avoid emacs on slow machines and use vim or jed instead :) |
| 10:58.36 | TD | even with lazy-lock off, it still takes about a second for emacs to notice that i typed a " and update the rest of the buffer to match |
| 10:58.45 | scanline | ohh, that |
| 10:58.48 | TD | this machine isn't slow, and the cpu is idle, so i think it's a timeout |
| 10:58.55 | scanline | I'm not sure, I'd like to know how to fix that too :) |
| 10:59.00 | TD | hehehe. bollocks |
| 10:59.08 | TD | well, if i find out i'll let you know :) |
| 10:59.12 | scanline | thanks |
| 10:59.31 | scanline | it does get pretty annoying when it takes a while to notice that the python docstring you just terminated is in fact ended |
| 11:00.11 | TD | yes, doubly puzzling as no other editor i've used has such problems with syntax highlighting, only emacs. i guess it's just the overhead of doing everything in lisp |
| 11:00.37 | scanline | or maybe they designed it for 3 MHz VAX boxen and haven't realized that these days you can do that in realtime |
| 11:01.37 | TD | i think you meant PDP-11 :) |
| 11:01.48 | scanline | ah, right |
| 11:01.51 | scanline | that's all before my time :) |
| 11:02.32 | TD | sort of makes me glad lisp machines never took off..... |
| 11:03.03 | scanline | well, I do have a soft spot in my heart for functional programming in general, even though I've never done any real lisp :) |
| 11:03.57 | TD | everytime i read about lisps features, i think to myself "I should really like this language", then i see stuff like this: |
| 11:04.00 | TD | (lambda (*<8-]= *<8-[= ) (or *<8-]= *<8-[= )) |
| 11:04.03 | TD | and think...... hmmm, no |
| 11:04.31 | scanline | hmm |
| 11:04.39 | scanline | maybe using python in a functional style is a good compromise :) |
| 11:05.35 | TD | by the way, why is your box called navi? |
| 11:05.57 | TD | ah yes, xfree == 4 commits, ever. that's really quite sad, it's been quite a while since it was connected |
| 11:06.05 | scanline | it's named after the 'navi' computer systems in the anime Serial Experiments Lain |
| 11:06.28 | TD | heh, i thought it might be something like that. i've not seen that one (yet) |
| 11:06.34 | scanline | it's a good one :) |
| 11:06.51 | scanline | so far all my current computers have japanese names ending in 'i', and for no particular reason :) |
| 11:07.28 | TD | at least you don't call all your servers "jeeves" then think it's funny, like a previous employer i had did |
| 11:07.35 | scanline | ha |
| 12:28.19 | *** join/#picogui lalo (~lalo@200-203-012-232.cslce7004.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 14:06.14 | *** join/#picogui gonk2 (~brandon@h-66-167-27-8.DNVTCO56.covad.net) |
| 14:07.30 | *** join/#picogui gonked{out{ (~brandon@h-66-167-26-154.DNVTCO56.covad.net) |
| 14:35.47 | *** join/#picogui prpplague (~billybob@12.148.134.9) |
| 14:38.53 | gonkulator | prpplague: join #tacobeam |
| 14:38.59 | prpplague | ok |
| 14:45.20 | prpplague | scanline: ping |
| 14:46.21 | captain_proton | scanline is likely commuting at the moment |
| 14:46.33 | gonkulator | yeah, its monday |
| 14:46.37 | gonkulator | er, friday |
| 14:47.12 | prpplague | captain_proton: thanks |
| 16:24.04 | *** join/#picogui file (file@mctn1-3379.nb.aliant.net) |
| 16:36.43 | *** join/#picogui TD[out] (~mike@81-6-220-138.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 16:36.43 | *** join/#picogui gonk{work} (~Pineapple@ivan.client.mscd.edu) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 16:36.43 | *** join/#picogui jojo (~jojo@io.infidyne.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 16:36.43 | *** join/#picogui njs (njs@12-208-7-173.client.attbi.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 16:36.43 | *** join/#picogui nemo (nemo@61.95.53.30) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 17:59.37 | *** join/#picogui lalo (~lalo@200-203-012-232.cslce7004.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 18:09.22 | *** join/#picogui lalo (~lalo@200-203-012-232.cslce7004.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 18:35.52 | njs | TD[gone]: My guess is that that's an emacs feature, not a bug :-) |
| 18:36.54 | njs | (they don't want to color the whole buffer as a string constant as soon as you hit a ", because that's garbage, it's not actually a string constant, you just haven't finished typing what your line.) |
| 18:37.26 | lalo | yup, there is a delay for recoloring the buffer |
| 21:33.26 | *** join/#picogui Quatre (Quatre@bgp01110667bgs.westln01.mi.comcast.net) |
| 21:33.52 | *** part/#picogui Quatre (Quatre@bgp01110667bgs.westln01.mi.comcast.net) |
| 21:40.30 | *** join/#picogui flyback (~tempbox@12-227-27-36.client.attbi.com) |
| 21:48.32 | flyback | is there still a 16 bit dos version ? |
| 21:59.56 | *** join/#picogui file (file@mctn1-3087.nb.aliant.net) |
| 22:05.07 | prot-work | ...dos version? |
| 22:05.17 | file | DOS? where? |
| 22:05.29 | fishhead2 | NEVERMIND |
| 22:16.13 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <fishhead2> they have 2 vt100 software programs |
| 22:16.13 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <fishhead2> that DO NOT require a os |
| 22:16.13 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <fishhead2> and yuo can embed them into a network card bootrom |
| 22:16.13 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <kergoth> cool |
| 22:16.13 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <fishhead2> but the zloader is generic |
| 22:16.14 | fishhead2 | [18:12] <fishhead2> so it could be used for other stuff |
| 22:16.44 | fishhead2 | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/9247 |
| 23:33.32 | *** join/#picogui prpplague (~joebob@20-110.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com) |
| 23:38.40 | *** join/#picogui TD[gone] (~mike@62.3.251.160) |
| 23:52.42 | *** join/#picogui njs (njs@12-208-7-173.client.attbi.com) |