00:18.40 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:18.40 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:18.43 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:18.46 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:18.50 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:18.52 | tang^ | [18:13] < Jimzy> and .NET apps using c# is compiled |
00:18.54 | tang^ | [18:13] < techn9ne> but the point is if you put a .net app beside a java swing app |
00:18.58 | tang^ | [18:13] < Jimzy> so you would really have to compare it to bytecode to native code translated executables |
00:19.01 | tang^ | [18:13] < techn9ne> the .net app on the windows platform would be superior |
00:19.04 | tang^ | [18:13] < techn9ne> obviously you're tied to windows platform w/ .net |
00:19.06 | tang^ | [18:14] < techn9ne> but the point is... java should be doing everything it can to keep pace |
00:19.09 | tang^ | [18:15] < Jimzy> well i don't think you need to tell any company that..everybody knows if you don't compete you loose |
00:19.12 | tang^ | [18:15] < Jimzy> :P |
00:19.15 | tang^ | [18:17] .::::. [QUIT]: Byte [blackhole@byte.ipv6.fullwormage.com] has QUIT ("I came, I saw, I ran away screaming") |
00:19.18 | tang^ | [18:18] .::::. [PART]: __blue [~mborodia@CPE002078d7a507-CM014140015673.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has LEFT #java () |
00:19.21 | tang^ | [3:#java(+cnt)] |
00:19.24 | tang^ | [16:18] < jkk> Spline: link in the javabeans tutorial |
00:19.26 | tang^ | [16:20] .::::. [QUIT]: Spline [~dj_aia@anja.isisnetworks.net] has QUIT (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) |
00:19.29 | tang^ | [16:23] .::::. [JOIN]: Pandora- [1002@cip-69-46.bbs.surfcity.net] has JOINED #tomc |
00:19.32 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:19.35 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:19.39 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:19.41 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:19.45 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:19.47 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:19.49 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:19.52 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:19.55 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:19.58 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:20.01 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:20.04 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:20.08 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:20.10 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:20.13 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:20.18 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:20.20 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:20.21 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:20.24 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:20.27 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:20.30 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:20.32 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:20.35 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:20.38 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:20.41 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:20.44 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:20.46 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:20.49 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:20.53 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:20.55 | Pandora- | wtf tang^ |
00:20.56 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:20.57 | Pandora- | fuck off |
00:20.59 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:21.01 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:21.04 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:21.07 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:21.10 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:21.12 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:21.15 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:21.18 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:21.21 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:21.24 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:21.27 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:21.29 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:21.33 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:21.35 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:21.39 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:21.41 | tang^ | [17:37] <@Oorgo> heheheh |
00:21.44 | tang^ | [17:52] Oorgo (~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net) requested CTCP PING from #north: 1050105169 331885 |
00:21.47 | tang^ | [17:58] .::::. [QUIT]: Oorgo [~dherrick@h24-68-144-160.ed.shawcable.net] has QUIT (Quit: [BX] The FDA says 5 servings of BitchX a day increases sexual potency) |
00:21.50 | tang^ | [2:#north(+nt)] |
00:21.53 | tang^ | [18:12] < techn9ne> yea of course it does... |
00:33.48 | *** join/#tomcat CSMan (~csman@h24-78-186-124.vn.shawcable.net) |
00:36.00 | CSMan | can anybody give a hand in getting the mod_webapp connector working in my apache 2? |
01:10.35 | Pandora- | good luck |
01:10.39 | Pandora- | its a bitch |
01:10.55 | Pandora- | i've only gotten it working with 1.3 |
01:13.29 | CSMan | really |
01:14.11 | CSMan | heh... |
01:21.13 | *** join/#tomcat maplemahn (mapleman@cablelink45-124.intercable.net) |
02:37.52 | tang^ | holy crap |
02:38.22 | tang^ | my apologies to the channel... my kid got hold of the mouse |
02:52.52 | CSMan | lol |
02:53.09 | CSMan | i'm on a quest on howto get webapp work with apache2 |
02:53.26 | CSMan | anybody has any idea? |
02:54.54 | tang^ | not me. I only managed jk2 |
02:57.13 | CSMan | yeah, ppl manage with jk2, it'd be good to tell ppl how you can do it with webapp =D |
02:59.00 | tang^ | depends. I thought somebody said that webapp wasn't being developed any more while jk/jk2 was |
03:00.03 | CSMan | hmmmm... |
03:00.06 | CSMan | i see... |
03:00.16 | CSMan | well, i guess i can go thru jk2 then |
03:00.35 | CSMan | could you tell me some basic steps to make it work with apache2? |
03:00.37 | CSMan | =) |
03:01.29 | tang^ | well first off you need to get the connectors and compile jk2 |
03:05.23 | tang^ | once you have that, the connectors documentation for jk2 can be used. you need to set up workers2.properties in the apache conf and jk2.properties in tomcat conf |
03:06.56 | tang^ | I should really have written down the gotchas I ran into while compiling mine |
03:17.10 | *** join/#tomcat jkk (www@dyn-mcb-168-79.dyn.columbia.edu) |
03:22.37 | *** join/#tomcat Gnug225 (Gnug225@24.236.252.187.gha.mi.chartermi.net) |
04:05.52 | *** join/#tomcat redox (g2oxrud@b210-15.cdf.toronto.edu) |
04:06.29 | redox | hello |
04:07.18 | redox | I'm having problems including my css file in my index file on tomcat. Anyone experience such a problem? |
04:07.38 | tang^ | not offhand |
04:09.11 | redox | I've seen this question asked around on newsgroups and mailing lists but I haven't seen any good answers |
04:09.41 | tang^ | wierd... got a public server to look at? |
04:11.23 | redox | no its on a local server. Basically I'm including the style sheet but the web page is being displayed without it. The path to the css file is right so thats not a problem. btw I put everything in ROOT directory |
04:12.46 | tang^ | is the href to the css relative, full or empty? |
04:12.59 | tang^ | ie: this is mine - <link rel="StyleSheet" href="styles1.css" type="text/css"> |
04:14.14 | redox | yeh its just like that. If I put that in a servlet then it works. But currently I have that in index.html file and it doesn't |
04:14.40 | tang^ | the css is in ROOT as well? |
04:14.55 | redox | yeh |
04:15.29 | redox | really wierd but I've come across other people with the same problem |
04:16.18 | tang^ | that was index.html? |
04:17.13 | redox | yeh it doesn't work when its embedded in an html file. Before when I used to run it on regular Apache it worked fine but now on Tomcat it doesnt' |
04:17.42 | tang^ | I'm just wondering if there's some difference between index.html and index.jsp |
04:18.43 | tang^ | doesn't appear to be the case on my server |
04:20.06 | redox | strange, thanks anyways |
04:20.19 | tang^ | which version tomcat? |
04:22.05 | redox | 4.0.4 |
04:22.19 | tang^ | just a tad old |
04:28.01 | *** part/#tomcat Gnug225 (Gnug225@24.236.252.187.gha.mi.chartermi.net) |
04:32.42 | *** join/#tomcat Gnug225 (Gnug225@24.236.252.187.gha.mi.chartermi.net) |
04:34.07 | tang^ | hooray for BIOS updates that don't fry your system ;-) |
04:34.18 | tang^ | focus, tang. focus |
05:03.16 | *** join/#tomcat IRCMonkey (1000@65-85-207-106.client.dsl.net) |
05:06.17 | *** join/#tomcat bun0 (~hjkij@ppp-67-119-107-143.dialup.snfc21.pacbell.net) |
05:08.36 | bun0 | cocoon people around? |
05:09.52 | *** part/#tomcat bun0 (~hjkij@ppp-67-119-107-143.dialup.snfc21.pacbell.net) |
05:18.40 | *** join/#tomcat inkedmn (inkedmn@pool0562.cvx11-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net) |
05:19.40 | inkedmn | i must be missing something, but i've followed the RUNNING.txt file exactly and tomcat isn't starting (and it's not giving any errors) |
05:20.47 | inkedmn | (i'm in linux, btw) |
05:21.43 | inkedmn | and when i stop it, i get a big old traceback starting w/ Connection Refused |
05:22.08 | tang^ | which would make sense if it didn't start at all |
05:22.35 | inkedmn | indeed |
05:22.55 | tang^ | which version tomcat? how installed? |
05:23.06 | inkedmn | just so i'm clear, i just need to set JAVA_HOME and CATALINA_HOME? |
05:23.09 | jkk | has anybody ever used the BeanContext api? |
05:23.21 | inkedmn | 4.1.24 |
05:23.22 | tang^ | jkk: not I |
05:23.36 | inkedmn | and i just dl'd the tar.gz file and untarred it in /usr/local |
05:24.30 | tang^ | inkedmn: you are starting it as root or its own account? are the file permissions such that whatever account you start as can write files into the logs directory? |
05:24.47 | jkk | tang^: i wonder why. it seems like it'd be more than possible to build the servlet api on top of the BeanContext api. |
05:24.49 | inkedmn | tang^: i've tried both, same result each time |
05:26.59 | inkedmn | tang^: can i show you what i get when i run startup.sh? |
05:27.08 | inkedmn | (just to make sure it's what's supposed to be happening) |
05:27.16 | inkedmn | it's like 5 lines |
05:27.21 | tang^ | inkedmn: sure dump it in #flood |
05:27.30 | inkedmn | alright |
05:28.35 | tang^ | is that JAVA_HOME correct? |
05:29.07 | inkedmn | yes |
05:29.29 | inkedmn | well, it doesn't have to be pointed at the /bin directory, does it? |
05:30.03 | inkedmn | just the main java directory |
05:30.14 | tang^ | just wondered because mine is j2sdk1.4.1_01 |
05:30.34 | tang^ | just the main |
05:30.49 | inkedmn | ok |
05:30.59 | inkedmn | inkedmn@skank:/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.24/bin$ ls $JAVA_HOME |
05:31.07 | inkedmn | COPYRIGHT LICENSE README README.html bin demo include jre lib man src.zip |
05:31.12 | tang^ | and there's nothing in logs |
05:31.15 | tang^ | ? |
05:34.00 | tang^ | you change anything in tomcat before starting it up? |
05:34.35 | inkedmn | ok apparently 8080 is already in use... |
05:34.40 | inkedmn | according to the log |
05:34.43 | tang^ | oops |
05:34.53 | tang^ | that'll do it |
05:34.54 | inkedmn | but i don't have any idea what would be using it... |
05:35.15 | inkedmn | heh, yeah |
05:36.33 | tang^ | as root, run "netstat -nlp | grep 8080" to get your answer |
05:36.48 | inkedmn | ok |
05:37.01 | tang^ | hmm, I really need to finish fixing my web site so I can upgrade from 4.1.18 |
05:37.07 | inkedmn | bah, effing wwwoffled |
05:37.33 | inkedmn | i don't even know what the hell that program does, debian just installed it without asking... |
05:37.34 | tang^ | a proxy? |
05:38.03 | inkedmn | no idea |
05:38.05 | inkedmn | but, it's gone |
05:38.08 | tang^ | it's an offline explorer |
05:38.47 | tang^ | set your browser's proxy to port 8080 on your machine and wwwoffle will cache all the stuff you surf |
05:39.19 | inkedmn | ah |
05:39.21 | inkedmn | well, i'm outta here |
05:39.25 | inkedmn | thanks for the help, i'll have to figure it out later |
05:39.54 | *** join/#tomcat The_Vulture (~vulture@CPE-144-132-199-18.nsw.bigpond.net.au) |
05:50.35 | *** join/#tomcat bun0 (~hjkij@ppp-67-119-107-143.dialup.snfc21.pacbell.net) |
06:59.54 | jkk | The_Vulture: what do you do when your junit test case constructor throws an exception? |
07:00.45 | The_Vulture | stop doing non-trivial stuff in the constructor I suppose.. |
07:00.59 | The_Vulture | if it's JUnit's fault, I write a unit test that shows the failure, if possible, and report it to the developers |
07:02.21 | jkk | The_Vulture: i have an abstract base test class where i just read in a 'test.properties' file in the ctor... now junit wants me to add a default constructor that throws an exception to all my tests |
07:02.24 | jkk | is there a better way? |
07:03.38 | The_Vulture | you mean when your test case constructor can throw an exception (rather than when it actually is).. how does JUnit express that it "wants" you to add a default constructor that throws an exception to all your tests? |
07:03.48 | The_Vulture | I'd think it'd be the compiler telling you that, not JUnit. |
07:04.57 | jkk | The_Vulture: well duh, it's the compiler. how do i fix it? |
07:05.17 | jkk | is it ok to call 'fail()' in the constructor of a test case? and how come fail() doesn't take a throwable argument? |
07:05.32 | The_Vulture | stop declaring that your constructor throws an exception, catch it there, or declare that all your subclasses constructors throw that exception as well |
07:05.53 | The_Vulture | I suspect you really should be doing this reading in stuff in the setUp method.. but that |
07:05.56 | The_Vulture | s just me |
07:06.15 | The_Vulture | In any case, is there any problem with having your subclass constructors (or subclass' setUp methods) throw that exception? |
07:07.12 | jkk | The_Vulture: but this is non-trivial stuff, and junit calls setUp each time a test* method is invoked |
07:07.47 | The_Vulture | yes.. that's kind of important whent doing tests, you don't want one test accidently effecting others |
07:08.00 | jkk | The_Vulture: but this is stuff that really should only happen once |
07:08.52 | The_Vulture | I'd probably disagree (since I Don't know the specifics I can't say for sure), setUp is there for the stuff that's necessary to run the test.. |
07:09.08 | The_Vulture | in any case, is there a problem with declaring your constructor throws whatever exception you want it to? |
07:10.31 | The_Vulture | one of the suggestions in setUp is for network connections, those are certainly non-trivial, and probably cost more than reading a file or two (depending on the size, yes, but you get the point) |
07:11.41 | jkk | The_Vulture: so you think it's ok to do non-trivial stuff in setUp? hmmm, interesting ... i don't want to have to create a default ctor in all my tests, i need tests to be quick and dirty to write... but i see your point. thanks for your advice. |
07:12.41 | The_Vulture | np, the docs seem to be pretty clear that setting the test up should be done in setUp.. I dunno why you'd be writing constructors in your TestCases at all, in general (you used to have to write a simple constructor that took a String or something I think.. I think that's deprecated now) |
07:15.36 | jkk | The_Vulture: hmm, interesting point of view. ill look into it. i wish there were some clearly defined best practices for using junit |
07:17.55 | The_Vulture | *nods* I haven't really used it extensively, used it a bit on some assignments last year, I really should setup a subversion, junit, maybe maven, etc working area, and just throw some stuff into the mix |
07:18.48 | jkk | yeah, just gotta practice, practice practice |
07:18.55 | jkk | i'm gonna use maven on my container project |
07:19.09 | The_Vulture | *nods* neat-o |
07:19.13 | jkk | i think. i've heard a lot of bad things about maven particularly about it's beta status. |
07:19.45 | jkk | and the way it does jar dependency resolution is just scary (based on the jar filename). but i think i might give it a whirl. i love ant tho, so who knows. |
07:19.49 | The_Vulture | I haven't looked into it too much, but I really want a nice modular, general build system (something along the lines of NetBeans nbbuild system) |
07:21.26 | The_Vulture | any idea where the Maven page has gone? |
07:21.50 | The_Vulture | http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/mavin is no longer in existence.. maybe it's in the process of being moved, perhaps coming a standalone jakarta project.. *shrugs* |
07:22.03 | The_Vulture | ah, sorry, there it is |
07:22.05 | The_Vulture | maven.apache.org |
07:22.08 | jkk | The_Vulture: maven.apache.org |
07:22.12 | jkk | it's top-level now |
07:22.15 | The_Vulture | google hasn't quite caught up |
07:22.45 | jkk | it's wierd that maven is top-level and doesn't even have a 1.0 yet, i heard that also pissed a lot of people off |
07:22.47 | The_Vulture | someone must have decided it's a rather big deal, not many other jakarta projects have got their own domains that I know of |
07:23.14 | The_Vulture | gone from being a subproject of turbine, to it's own top level project, in some way, above all other jakarta projects.. certain to piss someone off |
07:24.11 | jkk | yes, indeed |
07:25.27 | The_Vulture | interesting icon: http://maven.apache.org/images/logos/maven-propaganda.png |
07:25.49 | jkk | heh, slightly disturbing. |
07:25.56 | The_Vulture | *nods* |
07:38.00 | jkk | you know, i am really liking the BeanContext api |
07:38.08 | jkk | i dunno why sun doesn't use it more |
08:50.58 | *** join/#tomcat redox (~redox@65.48.210.72) |
08:51.07 | redox | hello |
08:52.30 | redox | anyone ever have a problem with using CSS files with Tomcat? it doesn't seem to work for me |
10:19.43 | *** join/#tomcat PW_Wrk_Away (~Pointwood@fw.agropark.dk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
10:20.39 | *** join/#tomcat Archeroff (~wade@h24-81-20-16.ok.shawcable.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
10:20.39 | *** join/#tomcat Raboo_ (rabi@nikson.dataphone.se) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
10:20.39 | *** join/#tomcat inconspicuous (~inconspic@stinkymonkey.cc.columbia.edu) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
10:20.39 | *** join/#tomcat bugfixer (~bugfixer@42gis175.gulftel.com) |
10:46.38 | *** join/#tomcat vx`schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-049-191.arcor-ip.net) |
12:38.53 | *** join/#tomcat jkk (www@dyn-mcb-168-79.dyn.columbia.edu) |
13:59.41 | *** join/#tomcat Remm (~chatzilla@AToulouse-206-1-2-185.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
14:17.03 | *** join/#tomcat dizzy (~chatzilla@pcp03303463pcs.ypwest01.mi.comcast.net) |
14:17.59 | dizzysaurus | ok, nickserv didn't complain about that one. |
14:19.39 | dizzysaurus | Hello. I'm a sysadmin in charge of a tomcat installation. I have a professor saying that his phoenix browser became infected with a javascript file after he visited a tomcat served page - the javascript apparently redirects his browser to porn sites. Anybody know anything about this? |
14:21.21 | The_Vulture | dizzysaurus: that'd certainly not have anything to do with Tomcat itself, at best, to do with a poorly configured web browser, and some malicious content someone put on your server |
14:21.33 | The_Vulture | chances are it's actually related to some stupid porn site he visited |
14:21.37 | dizzysaurus | indeed |
14:22.09 | dizzysaurus | I will investigate further - at least it's not a known tomcat worm or anything. Thank you for your help |
14:23.21 | The_Vulture | Well I can't guarantee it's not a tomcat worm, but I don't know about it, and I certainly doubt it is, if you seriously think it could be you could check the bug tracking system, and/or the tomcat-users mailing list which I guess exists |
14:25.58 | dizzysaurus | yeah, there's nothing in the tomcat bugzilla |
14:32.40 | *** join/#tomcat bgood (~bgood@user-0c8hsnd.cable.mindspring.com) |
14:57.04 | *** join/#tomcat mDuff (~cduffy@cs6625139-96.austin.rr.com) |
14:57.37 | mDuff | Is there a way to specify that my AJP (Coyote) connector only listen for connections from localhost? |
15:01.17 | mDuff | mmm... useful. |
15:10.56 | *** join/#tomcat larsbot (~larsga@193.69.113.28) |
15:11.34 | larsbot | what do I do when tomcat won't recognize my application, nor tell my why? |
15:12.20 | The_Vulture | larsbot: where's your application, why do you expect tomcat to "recognise" it, and what do you expect it to do, exactly, and what does it do? |
15:16.50 | larsbot | I put the application directory in webapps/ |
15:16.55 | larsbot | then start tomcat |
15:17.10 | mDuff | larsbot: checked the logs? |
15:17.19 | larsbot | try to acecss the web application and get "the requested resource isnot vaialble" |
15:17.28 | larsbot | the application is not mentioned in the logs, which is what puzzles me |
15:17.38 | larsbot | this is tomcat 4.1.24, btw |
15:19.38 | larsbot | if I do "grep omnigator /var/tomcat4/logs/*" I get nothing... |
15:19.43 | The_Vulture | larsbot: and what exactly did you put in webapps and where did you put it |
15:19.43 | larsbot | omnigator is the webapp |
15:20.33 | larsbot | put it in /var/tomcat4/webapps, where the other ones are |
15:20.57 | The_Vulture | be more specific, provide some complete paths to the relevent files in your webapp (eg: web.xml, one or two of the classes/jsps etc) |
15:20.58 | larsbot | I put the directory that contains index.jsp, WEB-INF etc there and called it 'omnigator' |
15:21.17 | mDuff | larsbot, so there exists a file /var/tomcat4/webapps/omngator/WEB-INF/web.xml? |
15:21.25 | larsbot | yes |
15:21.58 | The_Vulture | larsbot: provide complete paths.. case sensitive etc |
15:22.15 | larsbot | [larsga@localhost larsga]$ ll /var/tomcat4/webapps/omnigator/WEB-INF/web.xml |
15:22.15 | larsbot | -rw-rw-r-- 1 larsga larsga 5503 Feb 12 17:20 /var/tomcat4/webapps/omnigator/WEB-INF/web.xml |
15:22.23 | larsbot | it's there |
15:22.40 | The_Vulture | and after restarting tomcat, and going to the admin or manager contexts, you don't see omnigator there? |
15:22.51 | The_Vulture | do you have any other custom webapps in /var/tomcat4/webapps/ ? |
15:22.58 | larsbot | I don't have manager/admin installed |
15:23.08 | larsbot | nope, no other custom ones, though I can acecss tomact-docs |
15:23.12 | The_Vulture | should be installed by default.. |
15:23.24 | larsbot | not inlcuded in the rpm I used, though there is one that has them |
15:24.19 | The_Vulture | nothing much I can suggest except to try a simple "hello world" like webapp test, or some pre-existing .wars that are verified (eg: from some pre-existing and functional project, your own, or a 3rd party).. |
15:25.30 | larsbot | hmmmm. I can try a simpler webapp that's just a servlet and see if that works |
15:25.34 | larsbot | thanks, anyway |
15:29.46 | tang^ | umm, grepping for omnigator isn't necessarily going to turn up your webapp. manually looking at logs/catalina.out might give you a clue, though |
15:31.09 | larsbot | did that, but there are no complaints there |
15:31.20 | larsbot | tomcat seems as happy as a clam |
15:31.49 | tang^ | that is wierd, then |
15:36.48 | tang^ | hmm, the sample build.xml that ships with the tomcat-docs is horribly borked |
15:49.22 | *** join/#tomcat ztopher (~ztopher@h151n7c1o1025.bredband.skanova.com) |
16:27.45 | ianni | s/the sample build.xml that ships with// s/-docs// |
16:27.46 | ianni | oops |
16:27.49 | ianni | hehe |
16:46.15 | tang^ | heh |
17:24.10 | CSMan | mr The_Vulture |
17:24.14 | CSMan | =D |
17:25.00 | CSMan | uhmmm.. i'm on a quest of getting mod_webapp to work with apache2, anybody have some info? |
17:26.21 | CSMan | s/of/for |
17:30.38 | CSMan | =( |
17:35.53 | *** join/#tomcat mapleman (mapleman@mapleman.usercloak.freenode) |
18:15.51 | *** join/#tomcat bun0 (~hjkij@ppp-67-119-107-93.dialup.snfc21.pacbell.net) |
19:19.04 | *** join/#tomcat akb (~akb@62.215.135.66) |
19:19.21 | akb | sup |
19:30.49 | *** join/#tomcat tang^ (~krachyn@ahgn23wky5824.ab.hsia.telus.net) |
20:04.05 | *** join/#tomcat akb (~akb@62.215.135.66) |
20:51.07 | CSMan | tang^: you there? |
20:57.21 | tang^ | more or less |
21:00.14 | CSMan | ok |
21:42.40 | *** join/#tomcat akb (~akb@62.215.135.66) |
21:42.53 | *** join/#tomcat Braincrash (~truxa@195.22.18.154) |
22:00.06 | *** part/#tomcat akb (~akb@62.215.135.66) |
23:32.18 | *** join/#tomcat bun0 (~hjkij@ppp-67-119-106-51.dialup.snfc21.pacbell.net) |
23:37.33 | *** join/#tomcat jkk (www@dyn-mcb-168-79.dyn.columbia.edu) |
23:49.17 | *** join/#tomcat rek (~formdata@dialup-65.58.143.68.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net) |
23:51.45 | *** join/#tomcat vx`schlumpf_2 (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-046-013.arcor-ip.net) |
23:52.20 | rek | how's the job market for java programmers? |