| 00:06.32 | kylev | np |
| 01:10.39 | *** join/#tomcat better (~webmaster@218.247.54.5) |
| 01:11.29 | better | anyone is here |
| 01:11.52 | better | who is using bigapache? |
| 01:12.01 | better | ????? |
| 01:54.42 | *** join/#tomcat agbert (agbert@12-246-3-76.client.attbi.com) |
| 02:19.30 | *** join/#tomcat vvikram (~vvikram@epic24.Stanford.EDU) |
| 02:19.33 | vvikram | hi |
| 02:20.49 | vvikram | i am having a really painful bug which i am not able to work around; my serlvet gets _initialized_ multiple times i.e the whole class [including the init()] seems to get called multiple times. can anyone tell me why? i am not very familiar with |
| 02:21.13 | vvikram | tomcat but i have checked the server.xml and web.xml files to see whether thigns are ok. |
| 02:22.04 | vvikram | is anyone around....? |
| 02:38.08 | *** join/#tomcat AB3557055b (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 02:59.52 | *** part/#tomcat vvikram (~vvikram@epic24.Stanford.EDU) |
| 04:49.11 | blueaqua | I have to configure mysql setting at server.xml? at tomcat conf? |
| 05:59.24 | *** join/#tomcat joered (~chatter@62-101-126-216.fastres.net) |
| 07:01.43 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-039-250.arcor-ip.net) |
| 07:25.52 | *** join/#tomcat duzzer (~duzzer@62.141.79.74) |
| 07:26.39 | *** join/#tomcat Adelheit (~none@80.146.165.65) |
| 07:32.50 | blueaqua | [Q] |
| 07:33.06 | blueaqua | how can i make global jdbc driver setting? server.xml = GlobalNamingResources ?? |
| 08:02.26 | blueaqua | java.sql.SQLException: Cannot load JDBC driver class 'null' ... <- is what i get |
| 08:02.49 | blueaqua | I did success with Context but I want to this configure to Global.. |
| 09:05.12 | BULLE | blueaqua: hahaha |
| 09:05.15 | BULLE | blueaqua: i have the same problem |
| 09:05.26 | BULLE | blueaqua: and yesterday two other people had the same problem |
| 09:05.48 | BULLE | blueaqua: in the end, we all tried to get the examples in the docs to work, but no one succeeded |
| 09:06.20 | BULLE | blueaqua: and, the docs says you should add the global resource via resource tags in server.xml |
| 09:06.34 | BULLE | but, it still just breaks |
| 09:41.26 | blueaqua | BULLE : i give up it.-_-; i just add static ..in Conent..area |
| 09:41.43 | blueaqua | If you succees, please tell me -0- |
| 09:42.26 | blueaqua | But it is ok except beautiful config -_-; |
| 09:44.55 | blueaqua | hey you guys! |
| 09:45.03 | blueaqua | I'm fine. |
| 09:45.16 | blueaqua | I'm a friend of blueaqua. |
| 09:58.56 | BULLE | blueaqua: he,i just hardcoded the jdbc connection for the time being |
| 09:59.25 | BULLE | blueaqua: its just a replacement of a few jndi method calls with a few jdbc calls, its not nice, and i wont get connection pools etc, but for simple devel phase,its more then ok |
| 11:08.01 | *** join/#tomcat Gnug225 (~Gnug225@24.236.252.194.gha.mi.chartermi.net) |
| 11:43.14 | *** join/#tomcat xenion (~moshel@212.150.9.195) |
| 11:44.31 | xenion | is there a replacment to JkEnvVar in mod_jk in tomcat 4.1 ? |
| 11:50.56 | xenion | does any one knows how to pass an environment variable from apache to tomcat 4 ? (using cgi) |
| 11:51.30 | BULLE | xenion: sad to say it, but it doesnt seem that there are much people that actualy know things here =) |
| 11:51.41 | BULLE | xenion: its just people like me, that has problems , and wants help =) |
| 11:51.52 | BULLE | xenion: well, atleast so far, that has been my experience |
| 11:52.02 | xenion | realy |
| 11:52.11 | xenion | any other irc channel ? |
| 11:52.15 | BULLE | xenion: not that i know of |
| 11:52.34 | xenion | i see. thanks any way |
| 11:52.53 | BULLE | xenion: cant hurt to idle here for some time though |
| 11:53.04 | BULLE | xenion: if you are lucky someone that has clues shows upp |
| 11:54.17 | xenion | hope so |
| 12:11.11 | AB3557055b | hello |
| 12:11.47 | Phantom | I was wondering if anyone ever got the IBM Java to work on Linux x86 ? |
| 12:17.28 | BULLE | Phantom: sure |
| 12:17.35 | BULLE | Phantom: if you mean the IBM jdk/jre |
| 12:17.40 | Phantom | jdk |
| 12:17.42 | Phantom | not jre |
| 12:17.45 | Phantom | how did you do it |
| 12:17.48 | BULLE | Phantom: well, the jdk uses the jre |
| 12:18.01 | BULLE | so its not one or the other, its either just jre, or jre+jdk you use |
| 12:18.01 | Phantom | is it better than Sun ? |
| 12:18.13 | Phantom | jre+jdk |
| 12:18.22 | BULLE | Phantom: better is a word that realy dont have a meaning untill you have defined the comparison criteria |
| 12:18.31 | BULLE | Phantom: my personal simple answear would be "no" |
| 12:19.13 | Phantom | I see welll I have this java based program that runs ok on sun I just wanted to see how good it wll be on IBM |
| 12:32.06 | *** join/#tomcat vakYpollo (~higopico@151.Red-80-36-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 14:06.31 | tang^ | IBM JDK does work on linux. Though I hear it has memory issues despite running faster in certain situations |
| 14:31.35 | *** join/#tomcat xenion (~moshel@212.150.9.195) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 14:31.35 | *** join/#tomcat duzzer (~duzzer@62.141.79.74) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 14:31.35 | *** join/#tomcat PW_Wrk_Away (~Pointwood@62.243.38.210) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 14:31.35 | *** join/#tomcat lv8pv (lv8pv@lv8pv.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 14:41.24 | *** join/#tomcat easyE ([BoU0fW6Bp@panix3.panix.com) |
| 15:04.03 | *** join/#tomcat richard_ (~richard@65.169.9.134) |
| 15:04.22 | richard_ | So do all the applications run in the same JVM? |
| 15:17.42 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-070-195.arcor-ip.net) |
| 15:21.22 | *** join/#tomcat randrew (~raj@dolmen.cc.columbia.edu) |
| 15:26.01 | *** part/#tomcat richard_ (~richard@65.169.9.134) |
| 15:40.39 | *** join/#tomcat B3217055 (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 16:04.32 | *** join/#tomcat mod_cure (~Cure@cs666863-15.austin.rr.com) |
| 16:05.51 | *** join/#tomcat vakYpollo (~higopico@151.Red-80-36-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 17:13.40 | *** join/#tomcat joe- (~jsauer@ip66-107-33-195.z33-107-66.customer.algx.net) |
| 17:48.41 | *** join/#tomcat ludeksa (zo@c4-ctn-26.absamail.co.za) |
| 17:49.03 | *** part/#tomcat ludeksa (zo@c4-ctn-26.absamail.co.za) |
| 18:25.20 | *** join/#tomcat AB3557055b (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 18:53.02 | *** join/#tomcat Plugh (plugh@adsl-68-122-77-189.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) |
| 18:54.31 | Plugh | hi there. I was wondering when 4.1.28 was slated for release. There's a bug, #21763, that I've run across that is a serious thorn in my side and I can't convince my boss to let me release our product with an unreleased Tomcat version. |
| 18:55.54 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb (~jasonb@67.124.81.122) |
| 19:00.28 | Plugh | jasonb: do you know when 4.1.28 is being released? |
| 19:03.40 | jasonb | hmm, nope, I don't know. I think most of the effort has now shifted to the 5.x branch. |
| 19:03.49 | jasonb | Plugh: Why do you need a 4.1.28 release? |
| 19:04.49 | Plugh | bug 21763 |
| 19:05.11 | Plugh | and my boss won't let me release our product with non-released Tomcat |
| 19:05.30 | Plugh | our customers won't stand for it either |
| 19:08.46 | jasonb | Hmm, so this is the Coyote HTTP 1.1 connector? |
| 19:09.13 | jasonb | 4.1.x still also bundles the older, but more stable HttpConnector that you could use instead. |
| 19:09.55 | Plugh | Thanks. I'll look into that. Any drawbacks to it? |
| 19:10.00 | jasonb | It may or may not work for you under heavy load, but I think it'd be more reliable than the Coyote connector, at least until 4.1.28. |
| 19:10.44 | jasonb | I found one awkward edge condition where both connectors end up failing under EXTREME traffic, but most people's sites will never be in that situation. |
| 19:11.00 | Plugh | it buckled under a stress test |
| 19:11.09 | jasonb | Try the HttpConnector. It may work for you. |
| 19:11.11 | Plugh | I don't expect this to be regular usage conditions |
| 19:11.39 | Plugh | Thanks! I'll give it a try |
| 19:11.47 | jasonb | Yup. |
| 19:11.59 | jasonb | I've found that at least in a couple of situations that fixes things. |
| 19:12.09 | jasonb | Also, what platform are you running Tomcat on? OS and OS version? |
| 19:12.32 | Plugh | Solaris Sparc |
| 19:12.43 | Plugh | SunOS 5.9 |
| 19:12.52 | Plugh | on an Ultra-80 |
| 19:13.12 | jasonb | Hmm, okay, that's good actually. You'll have few problems caused by the OS. |
| 19:13.28 | Plugh | this is actually a cross-platform product |
| 19:13.38 | jasonb | So what other platforms will you run it on? |
| 19:13.51 | Plugh | runs under NT/XP/2k and Linux as well |
| 19:14.27 | Plugh | we're also leaning toward OSX now that they've got some 8gig machines on the market |
| 19:14.46 | Plugh | just waiting for Java 1.4.x to stabilize there |
| 19:15.08 | jasonb | When you run it on Linux, which Linux distro and version? |
| 19:15.23 | Plugh | RH 8 & 9 |
| 19:15.42 | Plugh | it's really dependant on our customers though |
| 19:15.52 | Plugh | some are happy with 7.2 |
| 19:16.34 | Plugh | and some are doing the enterprise server thing, though we're not validating that platform |
| 19:17.47 | jasonb | I don't know about RH8, but on RH9 you should do this before starting Tomcat: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 |
| 19:18.22 | jasonb | I've found that doing this seems to fix an obscure bug that hangs connector threads (eventually hanging all of them). |
| 19:18.49 | jasonb | I think once that patch from bug 21763 gets into the code, that won't happen anymore, but for now it does. |
| 19:19.12 | Plugh | 8 is 2.4 kernel |
| 19:20.25 | jasonb | Yeah. So it may need the same setting, but I'm not positive because I don't know what causes the problem and I don't know why that setting seems to fix it on RH9, nor do I know if the same bug would occur in the exact versions of everything included in RH8. |
| 19:20.30 | Plugh | so that variable should work |
| 19:20.34 | jasonb | But, it's probably a good idea to set that anyway. |
| 19:20.50 | jasonb | I don't think that variable setting hurts anything w.r.t. Java, so I think it can only help. |
| 19:21.06 | Plugh | I do a Linux version detection in the installer. I can just add that as a matter of course |
| 19:21.14 | Plugh | for 8+ |
| 19:21.42 | Plugh | easy enough to put into setenv.sh |
| 19:21.51 | jasonb | Yes, at least 8 and 9, I'd suggest. Past that, I really don't know. |
| 19:22.11 | Plugh | I appreciate the help. Lunch just arrived :) |
| 19:22.43 | jasonb | Yeah, no prob. Have a good lunch. |
| 19:23.34 | *** join/#tomcat newbie (~newbie@19.Red-213-97-119.pooles.rima-tde.net) |
| 19:25.10 | *** join/#tomcat robilad (~topic@mpiat2304.ag2.mpi-sb.mpg.de) |
| 19:31.43 | *** join/#tomcat B3217055 (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 20:12.44 | *** part/#tomcat Plugh (plugh@adsl-68-122-77-189.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) |
| 20:29.10 | *** join/#tomcat B3217055 (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 20:46.02 | *** join/#tomcat sonnyjz (~Snak@LAPTOP.ISC-SEO.UPENN.EDU) |
| 20:46.06 | sonnyjz | hello |
| 20:46.15 | sonnyjz | I'm trying to configure tomcat to listen to 127.0.0.1 only |
| 20:51.17 | tang^ | been reading the docs? |
| 20:53.09 | sonnyjz | I have a book actually |
| 20:53.17 | sonnyjz | and I've setup the default host |
| 20:53.39 | sonnyjz | standalone, etc |
| 20:53.47 | sonnyjz | still seems to listen on the ip address of the machine |
| 20:55.36 | tang^ | it would seem that if you change <engine defaultHost="localhost"> <host name="localhost"> it should only listen on localhost |
| 20:56.49 | sonnyjz | hehe that's what I have, I must have something else wrong |
| 20:58.19 | tang^ | you can specify an address= for a connector |
| 20:59.08 | sonnyjz | change Engine name="standalone" to "localhost" ? |
| 20:59.58 | tang^ | the name is used for logging. |
| 21:02.26 | tang^ | you'll have at least one connector in your service (probably a coyote1.1) |
| 21:03.15 | tang^ | your connector will tell tomcat what address to listen on |
| 21:05.00 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (marcel@dsl-082-082-070-195.arcor-ip.net) |
| 21:11.23 | sonnyjz | thanks I will keep trying it out |
| 21:11.31 | sonnyjz | appreciate the help :) |
| 21:12.04 | tang^ | sure... I may just try it myself when I get home |
| 21:16.55 | *** join/#tomcat AB3557055b (~A3217055@puma.cabm.rutgers.edu) |
| 21:27.35 | *** join/#tomcat Spline (~dj_aia@wsip-68-99-67-114.ok.ok.cox.net) |
| 21:39.20 | joe- | does anyone have all the rpms required for tomcat4 to run on a vanilla rhl9 handy, such as in one dir? |
| 21:42.43 | tang^ | not I. I prefer to self-install |
| 21:43.21 | joe- | even all the src.rpms would be wonderful :) |
| 21:53.54 | tang^ | I just pick up the source packages from the tomcat website |
| 21:59.27 | joe- | yes, but I need to be able to instal it on a few boxen repeatedly for some test so either building my own rpms or using someone elses for now would save me a lot of time. call me what you will but I like keeping rpms bases systems rpm only systems... |
| 21:59.57 | joe- | otherwise things get messy... |
| 22:01.51 | tang^ | I understand... I've only ever had one or two boxes to keep updated so it wasn't a lot of work to do it by hand |
| 22:04.15 | joe- | yah |
| 22:05.10 | *** join/#tomcat willofthewisps (~chatzilla@4.17.140.34) |
| 22:24.44 | *** join/#tomcat AlexMc (~alex@public1-walt1-3-cust26.lond.broadband.ntl.com) |
| 22:43.06 | *** join/#tomcat Spline (~dj_aia@wsip-68-99-67-114.ok.ok.cox.net) |
| 22:46.21 | *** part/#tomcat randrew (~raj@dolmen.cc.columbia.edu) |
| 23:42.03 | *** join/#tomcat Spline (~dj_aia@wsip-68-99-67-114.ok.ok.cox.net) |