00:32.30 | *** part/#tomcat cheapskate (~se@c-24-6-24-177.client.comcast.net) |
01:05.27 | Guy- | drat. I could have thought of that. |
03:31.27 | *** join/#tomcat cheeser (~cheeser@166.93.225.25) |
04:13.18 | *** join/#tomcat Gnug225 (~Gnug225@24.236.252.214.gha.mi.chartermi.net) |
04:51.59 | *** join/#tomcat ambigious (yo@168.187.87.82) |
04:52.19 | *** part/#tomcat ambigious (yo@168.187.87.82) |
05:09.02 | *** join/#tomcat IRCMonkey (~chatzilla@h-66-166-253-218.PHNDAZ91.covad.net) |
05:59.50 | *** join/#tomcat schtinky (~boyeeeee@pcp713401pcs.alxndr01.va.comcast.net) |
06:00.03 | schtinky | I need some quick Tomcat help: I had some pages being served over 8080 on the normal unsecure port and thought I needed a secure connection. So I rigged up a coyote container to handle connections over 8443. The pages served fine. Now, I don't need secure anymore, but I can't get the pages to serve over 8080 again. What gives? |
06:00.39 | cheeser | change the host definition |
06:00.52 | schtinky | I'm very new, so use small words |
06:00.59 | schtinky | where can I do that |
06:01.33 | cheeser | conf/server.xml |
06:01.37 | cheeser | i'm off to bed. |
06:01.40 | cheeser | g'night all. |
06:02.04 | schtinky | wait a sec |
06:02.05 | schtinky | please |
06:02.22 | schtinky | I've been tooling around in server.xml for a while |
06:02.27 | schtinky | I commented out the 8443 part |
06:02.33 | schtinky | but it doesn't seem to help |
06:02.39 | schtinky | I've restarted apache and tomcat |
06:02.41 | schtinky | no help |
06:31.07 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb (mdkuser@adsl-66-124-73-250.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) |
08:19.36 | *** join/#tomcat rootLinux (rootLinux@148.231.191.28) |
08:19.39 | rootLinux | hi.. |
08:20.11 | rootLinux | i want install tomcat in 2 diferents counts... |
08:23.30 | rootLinux | ? |
08:36.50 | *** part/#tomcat rootLinux (rootLinux@148.231.191.28) |
08:44.36 | *** join/#tomcat rover_ (~chatzilla@200.80.209.34) |
08:46.35 | rover_ | hello, i've a problem intalling Tomcat 4.1.29, can u help me (or say where can find someone that can help me) ? |
09:31.34 | levon | morning people |
09:33.42 | *** join/#tomcat willem (~willem@213-84-243-32.adsl.xs4all.nl) |
09:47.14 | *** join/#tomcat petujek (~petujek@195.47.57.20) |
09:49.00 | *** join/#tomcat CanardWC (~Canard@195.68.95.98) |
09:49.08 | CanardWC | Hello |
09:50.38 | CanardWC | A newbie question, i have a class that is use both by an app ( console mode ) and by a jsp. How can i put it into the classpath of my webapp ? |
10:27.35 | levon | .. some people would get an answer if they just stayed long enough ;) |
10:28.22 | willem | yeah, don't try to IRC without DSL or cable :) |
10:28.40 | willem | which brings me to my own question.. :) |
10:29.58 | levon | lol |
10:30.05 | *** join/#tomcat willem (~willem@213-84-243-32.adsl.xs4all.nl) |
10:30.08 | levon | rotfl |
10:30.33 | willem | yeah, that was weird :) |
10:30.53 | levon | ;) |
10:31.02 | willem | seems that you just will get disconnected when you ask something here.. .:) |
10:31.24 | levon | rotfl |
10:32.44 | willem | but anyway, is there someone to confirm this feeling of mine? (or dispose it ftm) |
10:33.14 | willem | it seems a waste that tomcat needs to load both library sets |
10:37.27 | levon | hm... |
10:37.28 | levon | depends |
10:38.11 | levon | If you wanna use another library or version in your web app which would conflict with the version tomcat needs, you'll be in trouble without that class loader separation |
10:38.53 | levon | So IMHO this is a good thing. |
10:40.28 | willem | well the libs i use in the webapps are just our own java libraries for the webapps, so i cant imagine they would confict with tomcat's own libs |
10:40.46 | willem | so i think i will just give it a go and see how they perform... |
10:40.56 | willem | tx for the insight levon! |
10:41.17 | levon | no prob, willem. ;) |
10:42.05 | levon | but in my case I'm happy tomcat separates the class loaders. I have had some conflicts with 3rd party libraries, especially when it comes to jakarta-* libraries... |
10:44.21 | willem | yeah, i myself maybe have the same problem, as i'm using (for another app) a different version of xerces and xalan, but they dont seem to conflict though.... |
10:44.36 | willem | s/version/implementation |
10:50.01 | levon | yupp, same here |
10:50.18 | levon | but they would definately conflict w/o classloader sep. |
10:50.27 | levon | (at least, the versions I use) |
11:00.07 | willem | i['ve put them in the endorsed dir and removed the xalanImp and xercesImp jars and everything is fine.... |
11:00.52 | willem | that's the way the mmbase people say how to deploy mmbase (a dutch made CMS) |
11:01.39 | willem | that's the only way i got it to work, leaving them in the WEB-INF/lib of the webaopp threw me tomcat exceptions... |
11:07.56 | levon | hm, strange, leaving them in lib shouldn't conflict with the tomcat libs IMHO |
11:26.12 | willem | yeah, well, they do :) |
11:26.49 | willem | anyway, it doenst work when you leave them, so it also maybe a mmbase implementation issue, i'm not really into that yet... |
11:50.22 | *** join/#tomcat rvilleri (rvilleri@xs6.xs4all.nl) |
11:51.36 | rvilleri | Hello everybody! I found this channel on the tomcat website. I have a problem with the Tomcat connectors can I ask te question here? |
11:53.15 | levon | just ask, if someone knows, he'll answer |
11:55.15 | rvilleri | I have compiled the jk_mod2 module, put it into the apache configuration but the configuration command's like JkWorkersFile, JkMount, JkLogLevel etc does all give that the module is not included in the server. The Module has no error's do I think because when I don't use any Jk* command's apache gives no error's. |
12:01.21 | rvilleri | I think all the JK* syntax is changed in the mod_jk2 version.... |
12:01.40 | levon | hm, sorry, I can't tell, since I use tomcat standalone |
12:26.40 | *** join/#tomcat Asriel (~asriel@hoth.elysium.ltd.uk) |
13:12.43 | Asriel | has anyone had any problems with 4.1.29, mod_jk, apache 2 and http/1.0 connections/ |
13:12.43 | Asriel | ? |
13:13.23 | Asriel | I'm having a problem in that even though my servlet code is setting a non 200 response code and providing a body, mod_jk is still propgating the error to apache |
13:13.25 | Asriel | which breaks things |
13:13.42 | Asriel | oddly, 1.1 connections don't do this, and looking over the JK code, it doesn't seem to be the "intended" behaviour |
13:57.56 | *** join/#tomcat mod_cure (~Cure@cs666863-15.austin.rr.com) |
15:09.44 | *** join/#tomcat Spline (~dj_aia@wsip-68-99-67-114.ok.ok.cox.net) |
15:11.03 | *** join/#tomcat cilquirm (~cilq@65.246.162.129) |
15:12.07 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-039-098.arcor-ip.net) |
15:24.59 | *** join/#tomcat BMania (~chatzilla@65.118.213.24) |
15:25.06 | rvilleri | quit |
15:25.09 | rvilleri | exit |
15:26.52 | *** join/#tomcat tang^ (~tang@d142-173-196-96.abhsia.telus.net) |
15:27.45 | cilquirm | i got a question about sso and shared info between web applications |
15:29.09 | cilquirm | if i don't use the web application mechanisms of login |
15:29.38 | cilquirm | is it still possible to fake SSO so that a person who logs in will be recognized across all web applications? |
15:32.49 | Mr_Light | if you write a whole meganism yourself |
15:34.20 | cilquirm | i wouldn't mind it |
15:34.53 | cilquirm | i guess my big question would be how i retrieve the session info from within one context |
15:38.12 | Mr_Light | what do you miss with the normal thing? |
15:38.31 | cilquirm | well, i'm porting an application over |
15:38.59 | cilquirm | and one of the wacky thing about this application is that it has about 6 or 7 forms that one can use to log in |
15:39.25 | Mr_Light | can't you specify them all? |
15:40.20 | Mr_Light | no wait you can't |
15:40.22 | cilquirm | additionally, it's a customer centric website, so currently we don't make use of any realms |
15:41.23 | Mr_Light | you can also use a realm with your own db you do know that? |
15:42.44 | cilquirm | yes |
15:42.57 | cilquirm | but i'm inexperienced with it |
15:43.24 | cilquirm | though if you can only specify one form |
15:43.27 | cilquirm | then i'm still at a loss |
15:43.47 | Mr_Light | can't you use some includes? |
15:44.20 | cilquirm | jsp:includes? |
15:44.22 | cilquirm | i don't follow |
15:45.01 | Mr_Light | wait let me thik |
15:48.31 | *** join/#tomcat maciek__ (~maciek@200.93.143.81) |
16:05.52 | Mr_Light | it saved in the session |
16:21.57 | Mr_Light | cilquirm, thinking about it I beleave there was a problem before with that ask in #java |
16:29.30 | cilquirm | Mr_Light: thanks |
17:23.00 | *** join/#tomcat giovanna (~massimo@213.140.22.75) |
17:23.48 | giovanna | when the session go on invalidate state how can i link an event to it? |
17:29.52 | *** join/#tomcat randrew (~raj@dolmen.cc.columbia.edu) |
17:58.19 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-039-098.arcor-ip.net) |
18:13.48 | cilquirm | hey |
18:14.03 | cilquirm | giovanna: HttpSessionBindingListener |
18:14.37 | cilquirm | is there a way that i can set system level properties in the server.xml file? |
18:14.54 | cilquirm | equivalent to a System.setProperty() |
18:48.28 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-213-023-039-098.arcor-ip.net) |
18:53.08 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb (~jasonb@dsl017-050-098.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
19:09.35 | cilquirm | tomcat5 doesn't come with mail.jar? |
19:14.31 | jasonb | A full dist of it should. |
19:15.40 | jasonb | errr.. |
19:17.14 | jasonb | Actually, I guess not. |
19:17.23 | jasonb | That's interesting. |
19:23.13 | *** join/#tomcat AlexMc (~alex@80.1.127.26) |
19:27.20 | *** join/#tomcat maciek (~maciek@200.93.143.81) |
19:27.22 | jasonb | I guess TC5's build files are set up to not download the JavaMail jar by default, before compiling Tomcat. If the mail.jar exists where the build can find it, it gets included (and some of Tomcat's JavaMail support is built), but since it's not downloaded by default, it doesn't get included. |
19:28.11 | *** join/#tomcat |remac| (~maciek@200.93.143.81) |
19:28.37 | Guy- | um - how am I supposed to connect apache2 to tomcat5 with mod_jk? |
19:28.43 | Guy- | where do I get a workers.properties file from? |
19:29.09 | Guy- | in tomcat4, the ApacheConfig listener generated one, but that listener seems to be gone from tomcat5 |
19:29.37 | |remac| | Guy-: there is a good doc at apache |
19:30.30 | |remac| | Guy-: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html |
19:32.41 | Guy- | I am already looking at the tomcat5 docs |
19:33.56 | Guy- | I can't seem to find anything about jk and tomcat5 (not tomcat4) |
19:34.16 | Guy- | and the tomcat4 stuff doesn't apply, because it uses the ApacheConfig listener, which is gone from tomcat5 |
19:36.07 | Guy- | there is something on jk2, but I can't compile jk2 and anyway it says elsewhere that I should use jk because it's more stable |
19:36.54 | Guy- | I can't compile jk2 because it says: common/jk_channel_socket.c:74:2: #error "jk_channel_socket is deprecated" |
19:37.08 | Guy- | however this is obviously an integral part it won't work without |
19:49.35 | |remac| | Guy-: hmm, is it so bad for you to jump back to tomcat 4 ?? |
19:49.48 | |remac| | it is verry well supported and docummented |
19:55.46 | Guy- | oh, I had tried tomcat4 before this, but it failed in a very convulted way |
19:55.52 | Guy- | convoluted |
19:56.47 | Guy- | someone from this channel helped me with that, but we weren't able to find out what was wrong |
19:57.08 | Guy- | so I though I'd give tomcat5 a spin - especially since some of our developers already have it running on their windows boxes |
19:57.52 | |remac| | hmm i see |
19:57.53 | Guy- | s/gh/ght/ |
19:58.12 | Guy- | but now I was able to compile the last release version of jk2 (from nov-2002) |
19:58.22 | Guy- | (what didn't compile was CVS) |
19:58.55 | |remac| | evaluate what causes you less trouble |
19:59.11 | |remac| | solving a couple of things or maybe start all over again |
19:59.31 | |remac| | im sure both have +/- |
19:59.54 | Guy- | well, I have already started all over :) |
20:00.56 | Guy- | now I have mod_jk2, what do I do? |
20:01.14 | Guy- | it needs a workers2.properties, where do I get that from? |
20:01.32 | Guy- | ah, there is an example in the docs |
20:01.36 | *** join/#tomcat joered (~chatter@81.208.60.200) |
20:02.25 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-069-172.arcor-ip.net) |
20:06.48 | |remac| | hmmm |
20:14.01 | jasonb | cilquirm: Remy just verified to me that mail.jar and some other Sun jars are indeed not included in TC5 by default. He said the main idea is that most people don't use them, but that it's easy for people who do use them to add the jar(s). They were always optional anyway, since they are not mandatory in either the servlet or JSP specs. |
20:18.40 | cilquirm | ok |
20:18.43 | cilquirm | just checking |
20:20.22 | jasonb | Yeah. I think it's an important thing to be aware of for TC4 --> TC5 migration. |
20:26.45 | cilquirm | is anyone using TC5 under normal use |
20:26.50 | cilquirm | i know it's not production ready yet |
20:32.06 | jasonb | Yes it is. |
20:32.39 | jasonb | It was voted Stable yesterday, and the final 5.0.16 release binaries are available. It's just that no announcement has been sent out yet. :) |
20:33.14 | jasonb | My company isn't yet using it in production, but I'm sure hoping we'll start testing it soon. |
20:39.47 | cilquirm | i'm actually much happier with how much stricter tomcat is |
20:40.30 | cheeser | i'm using tomcat5 now for development |
20:41.30 | tang^ | I've been using tomcat5 for my home server for the last couple of months |
20:41.47 | cilquirm | i wish they had screenshots of the monitoring capabilities with the jmx stuff |
20:42.11 | cilquirm | in general, i think screenshots are good for business |
20:43.28 | jasonb | Hmm, there's no JMX monitoring console included with TC5. So, there can't be a screen shot of it. :) I've recently spent a couple of days putting together a JMX console for my company, and hooked up both TC4 and TC5 to see what the JMX difference was.. big difference! |
20:44.36 | jasonb | TC5's JMX actually has lots of useful things to read/write/invoke. TC4 is mainly read-only, although it has a few things you can set. But, no invoking of methods as far as I could tell. And, some objects didn't show up because (I think) they're not serializeable. |
20:45.14 | cilquirm | jasonb: did you use mc4j or does tomcat do its own thing wrt jmx |
20:45.15 | jasonb | Mainly, every element in server.xml is an object in Tomcat's engine that has JMX instrumentation. |
20:45.42 | cilquirm | wow, that is awesome |
20:45.44 | Guy- | jasonb: the 5.0.16 release binary is the same as the 5.0.16 alpha binary? |
20:46.18 | jasonb | cilquirm: Tomcat does not start a networked MBeanServer. It starts up a non-networked MBeanServer. So, even if you want to use MC4J, MC4J uses only RMI over the net, and Tomcat doesn't open a port for that. |
20:46.36 | jasonb | Guy-: It might be the same binaries.. I'd guess it is. |
20:48.17 | cilquirm | hmmm.. and i saw all those jmx-remote jar files in TC% |
20:48.53 | kylev | jasonb: can webapp JMX objects register with th TC JMX, uh, thingy? |
20:49.11 | kylev | like, say, an enhanced Struts controller? |
20:49.26 | jasonb | cilquirm: What I did was: I grabbed the source for MX4J-2.0b1 and compiled it and deployed some stuff into Tomcat that would make it open up a JMX Remote API connector server over SOAP, and then on the client side I wrote a (hacked) MX4J HttpAdapter client that uses the client end of the JMX Remote API SOAP connector. With all that set up, running, and connecting up, the HttpAdaptor serves a web page that contains an MX4J web UI conso |
20:49.26 | jasonb | mcat's MBeanServer. :) |
20:49.54 | kylev | jasonb: yeah, that |
20:50.49 | jasonb | kylev: If you know how to do it, you can register your webapp's MBeans with Tomcat's own MBeanServer. I'm not yet clear on whether this is the right way to go, but that's how we're currently doing it here. |
20:51.10 | kylev | seems to make sense to be able to do that |
20:51.24 | kylev | else I have to run my own mbean server |
20:51.31 | kylev | and listen on a port |
20:51.38 | kylev | make sure that doesn't conflict with other ports |
20:51.44 | kylev | blah, blah, blah per webapp |
20:52.00 | jasonb | yup. |
20:52.06 | kylev | I couldn't figure out how to find the MBeanServer in tc4.1 |
20:52.09 | jasonb | That's rather annoying and doesn't scale well. |
20:52.13 | kylev | but I barely spent time on it |
20:52.50 | jasonb | kylev: Your webapp has to be a "privileged" webapp in order to be able to tinker with TC's own classes, including accessing TC's MBeanServer. |
20:53.38 | kylev | ah. helpful hit. |
20:53.40 | kylev | hint. |
20:54.20 | jasonb | Also, you end up having to learn commons-modeler a bit since that's what Tomcat uses. |
20:54.35 | kylev | granularity would also be neat there |
20:54.48 | jasonb | granularity? |
20:55.07 | kylev | like, allow MBean registration but not calling |
20:55.29 | kylev | I can register my MBeans, but can't edit TC's config objects |
20:56.32 | jasonb | Welp, exposing any new APIs to a webapp would be an unofficial extension to the Servlet spec, which they're not going to do for portability/compatibility reasons. |
20:57.03 | jasonb | So, until the Servlet spec supports doing that, it's servlet-container-specific implementation. |
21:05.35 | *** join/#tomcat sonnyjz_ (~sonnyjz@LAPTOP.ISC-SEO.UPENN.EDU) |
21:05.55 | sonnyjz_ | hello running into a problem compiling jakarta-connector on aix 5.2 |
21:05.58 | sonnyjz_ | Making all in common |
21:05.59 | sonnyjz_ | <PROTECTED> |
21:05.59 | sonnyjz_ | /usr/bin/sh: ./libtool: not found. |
21:06.09 | sonnyjz_ | libtool exists in the current working dir |
21:06.12 | sonnyjz_ | what am I missing here ? |
21:07.19 | jasonb | libtool, I'd guess. |
21:08.49 | sonnyjz_ | ls -al libtool |
21:08.49 | sonnyjz_ | -rwxr-xr-x 1 aradmin remedy 146698 Dec 03 15:12 libtool |
21:09.50 | jasonb | what dir is that in? |
21:10.27 | *** join/#tomcat hay ([GxinmEaRy@bc108124.bendcable.com) |
21:10.33 | sonnyjz_ | $HOME/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.5-src/jk/native |
21:10.43 | sonnyjz_ | that's where I ran my configure with options |
21:10.49 | sonnyjz_ | and that's where I am running make from as well |
21:11.14 | jasonb | sonnyjz_: Well, your build is saying "Making all in common". Then it's saying it can't find ./libtool. To me, that means it can't find common/libtool. |
21:14.36 | sonnyjz_ | hh |
21:14.38 | sonnyjz_ | ahh yes |
21:15.20 | sonnyjz_ | modify the Makefile to point to where libtool is and re run make ? |
21:17.11 | sonnyjz_ | heh |
21:17.21 | sonnyjz_ | never puts libtool in the corresponding directories |
21:17.24 | sonnyjz_ | this stinks |
21:17.25 | jasonb | Whatever cures your AIX and pains. :) |
21:17.32 | sonnyjz_ | hehe |
21:17.33 | sonnyjz_ | funny |
21:17.58 | sonnyjz_ | I'm wondering why when it creates the makefile it does not create the corresponding libtool file |
21:18.51 | jasonb | At least I did, back when I used the httpd connectors. |
21:20.32 | sonnyjz_ | checking for libtool... ./libtool |
21:20.41 | sonnyjz_ | so I puts libtool the Makefile |
21:21.04 | sonnyjz_ | it finds ./libtool instead of $PWD/libtool in the Makefile |
21:21.06 | jasonb | That'll probably fix it. |
21:21.20 | sonnyjz_ | --with-libtool= ? |
21:22.12 | sonnyjz_ | heh I see |
21:22.22 | sonnyjz_ | on aix it builds the actual libtool first |
21:22.26 | sonnyjz_ | funny |
21:22.32 | sonnyjz_ | lovely aix :) |
21:32.13 | sonnyjz_ | ahh now it's complaining that it doesn't like AIX's ld |
21:32.23 | sonnyjz_ | ah well I'll play around with it tomorrow |
21:32.33 | sonnyjz_ | thanks a lot for your help jasonb always good to have fresh eyes on things |
21:32.38 | sonnyjz_ | have a good one. |
21:41.01 | kylev | remm just checked in the doc change to remove "beta" from 5.0.16 |
21:41.46 | kylev | go to the tomcat site and furiously hit reload until the front page updates |
21:42.22 | jasonb | hehe |
21:43.00 | *** join/#tomcat mod_cure (~Cure@cs666863-15.austin.rr.com) |
21:56.54 | hay | what is the difference between the 5.0.14-deployer and 5.0.14 tar files? |
21:57.58 | jasonb | The deployer is a stand-alone program, separate from Tomcat. It deploys webapps into Tomcat. |
21:58.10 | hay | jasonb: thanks |
21:58.20 | jasonb | hay: You're welcome. |
22:11.23 | kylev | ah, man. the first non-jk question in days and I missed it. |
22:13.42 | Guy- | actually, there have been a few :) |
22:14.00 | cheeser | like installing tomcat5 as a service |
22:14.01 | cheeser | 8^)= |
22:14.22 | Guy- | and determining that apache says forbidden because the directory isn't +x :) |
22:14.39 | cheeser | Guy-: that's actually a linux thing, afaik |
22:16.23 | Guy- | it's more like a unix thing, but anyway, it was a non-jk question asked here yesterday :) |
22:17.20 | cheeser | indeed |
22:19.26 | *** join/#tomcat Remm (~chatzilla@languedoc-2-81-56-82-160.fbx.proxad.net) |
22:23.49 | Remm | hi :) |
22:24.35 | Remm | so tomcat 5.0 is now officially stable (at last) |
22:25.09 | cilquirm | woo hoo! |
22:25.33 | Remm | better late than never, i guess ;-) |
22:25.34 | cilquirm | ok, if i create my own tag |
22:25.49 | Guy- | is there more up to date documentation for jk2 than http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html? |
22:25.56 | cilquirm | deoes each method that supports an attribute have to be declared in that class or can it be in a superclass? |
22:25.57 | jasonb | Remm: It's not so late, I don't think. |
22:26.16 | Remm | the CVS doc might have a few more updates, but not too much :-( |
22:28.10 | Guy- | when I use the jni inprocess stuff, i.e. mod_jk2 starts tomcat (is that right?) what user is tomcat started as? root? the user apache normally runs as? or is it configurable? |
22:29.18 | Remm | it should be the apache user |
22:30.15 | Remm | i think jni is more useful on win, though |
22:30.33 | Remm | on linux, the jk2 folks keep saying domain sockets are equivalent :) |
22:30.41 | Guy- | OK |
22:30.46 | Guy- | I'll do it the socket way then |
22:31.47 | Remm | one big advantage for jni: you don't have to remember to start or stop TC :) |
22:32.16 | cheeser | Remm: does tomcat -install work on 5.0.16? |
22:32.40 | Guy- | Remm: well, that's actually a disadvantage, because then tomcat can't be restarted without stopping apache too |
22:33.30 | Remm | well, yes, indeed. i like to think TC is stable enough ;-) |
22:33.37 | Remm | tomcat -install ? |
22:34.26 | cheeser | installs tomcat as a service |
22:34.28 | cheeser | on NT |
22:34.34 | cheeser | well, windows |
22:40.26 | cilquirm | does anyone know if the jsp 1.2 spec changed the rules about overloading set() |
22:40.37 | cilquirm | setX() methods in tags? |
22:45.25 | cheeser | has anyone gotten installing tomcat as a windows service working? |
22:47.44 | cilquirm | my question first! ;-) |
22:48.42 | cheeser | no! |
22:48.47 | cheeser | i asked mine two days ago! |
22:50.01 | jupi` | bonne nuit ++ :) |
22:51.05 | cheeser | ah ha! |
22:51.12 | cheeser | that's broken in tomcat5 |
22:51.23 | cheeser | i just tried the same command with 4 and it worked! |
22:51.34 | cheeser | POS! |
22:55.50 | cheeser | services on unix are a no brainer. |
22:55.54 | cheeser | windows has to make it so hard. |
22:55.58 | cheeser | the bastages. |
22:56.35 | tang^ | cheeser: soures or binaries? |
22:57.03 | hay | my comment was more towards the good code and good documentation. it all seemed to work ok (need a little more detail for creating a user tho) |
22:57.05 | cheeser | binaries |
22:57.18 | cheeser | hay: indeed. it's pretty straightforward. |
22:57.33 | tang^ | cheeser: zip or exe? |
22:57.43 | hay | thanks to all tomcat5 developers and document writers |
22:57.44 | cheeser | zip |
22:57.48 | cheeser | the exe part works. |
22:58.01 | cheeser | but i'm not sure we can use the exe when we deploy |
22:58.19 | tang^ | is the exe an installshield exe? |
22:58.26 | cheeser | i.e., using the InstallShield guy, the service part works. |
22:58.36 | tang^ | because you can script that and make it a silent install :) |
22:59.24 | cheeser | have docs on how to do that? |
22:59.40 | tang^ | if its installshield, there are some on their site |
22:59.48 | tang^ | it's been a while since I did that |
23:00.34 | cheeser | k. i'll check that out then |
23:01.38 | cheeser | i don't think the tomcat.exe does anything in tomcat5 |
23:01.43 | cheeser | not even help |
23:02.49 | tang^ | gah, I hate typing ls in a command prompt |
23:04.20 | cheeser | cygwin |
23:04.45 | tang^ | it'd be fine in cygwin, but I had a command prompt handy |
23:04.57 | tang^ | and it takes so long to load the posix stuff to make ls work there |
23:05.37 | kylev | Remm: good work shoving 5.0 out |
23:06.35 | kylev | now you can hang out here and answer jk questions |
23:07.07 | cheeser | Remm: you on the tomcat team? |
23:08.47 | tang^ | hmm, running startup.bat killed my command prompt |
23:09.56 | tang^ | the tc5 binary zip is rather unhappy |
23:12.30 | cheeser | how do i rebuild that exe? |
23:12.37 | cheeser | is that included in the -src zip? |
23:13.13 | kylev | I believe so, yes |
23:13.35 | cheeser | k. |
23:15.16 | tang^ | I'm not seeing it, but its a quick perusal |
23:15.56 | cheeser | yay. tomcat's site comes up empty |
23:16.06 | cheeser | there it is. |
23:16.15 | cheeser | must've caught an update or something |
23:21.45 | *** join/#tomcat BMania (~chatzilla@65.118.213.24) |
23:26.02 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-069-172.arcor-ip.net) |
23:48.25 | jasonb | The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.0.16 Stable. |
23:48.25 | jasonb | Please refer to the changelog for the list of changes. |
23:48.25 | jasonb | Downloads: |
23:48.25 | jasonb | Binaries: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi |
23:48.25 | jasonb | Sources: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi |
23:48.26 | jasonb | The Apache Tomcat Team |
23:49.25 | Mr_Light | w00t |
23:49.43 | *** part/#tomcat randrew (~raj@dolmen.cc.columbia.edu) |