00:04.53 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf2 (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-064-008.arcor-ip.net) |
00:13.25 | *** part/#tomcat JCScoobyRS (~JCScoobyR@65.116.245.5) |
00:22.47 | *** join/#tomcat stratus (~stratus@RJ181089.user.veloxzone.com.br) |
00:25.39 | stratus | jasonc_away, ping |
00:30.58 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb_ (~jasonb@dsl017-050-098.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
01:16.25 | *** join/#tomcat findme (~findme@63-227-27-237.dnvr.qwest.net) |
01:21.21 | *** part/#tomcat stratus (~stratus@RJ181089.user.veloxzone.com.br) |
01:23.40 | *** join/#tomcat fhobia (~not@c-24-6-88-178.client.comcast.net) |
05:38.43 | *** join/#tomcat heaps (~hjkij@168-pool1.ras10.capax.alerondial.net) |
06:26.00 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb_ (mdkuser@adsl-66-124-73-250.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) |
06:36.57 | *** part/#tomcat heaps (~hjkij@168-pool1.ras10.capax.alerondial.net) |
06:52.54 | *** join/#tomcat fhobia (~not@c-24-6-88-178.client.comcast.net) |
06:58.41 | fhobia | hey all, i have webpages stored in a directory which apache reads...i have an index.jsp in the same folder and i want apache to redirect the page to tomcat (i set up the jk2 connector etc..)...but tomcat always ends us displaying the index.jsp in the root folder? how can i make it interpret jsp pages in the apache directory? |
06:59.23 | fhobia | in other words, how do i change the development directory? :P |
08:16.00 | *** join/#tomcat willem (~willem@213-84-243-32.adsl.xs4all.nl) |
09:03.34 | *** join/#tomcat joered (~chatter@81.208.60.200) |
09:24.07 | *** join/#tomcat levon (~levon@62.48.88.178) |
10:41.56 | *** join/#tomcat mrbhave (~mrbhave@host22-14.pool212171.interbusiness.it) |
10:42.03 | mrbhave | anyone alive here |
10:42.47 | mrbhave | is it ok to have fork set to true in development phase? docs says to set it to true in production phase only.. but in dev it seems ok also |
11:58.44 | mrbhave | no one here |
12:00.40 | hellabot | "testetete" pasted "test mesasge" at http://www.hellaweb.com/hellabot/106 |
13:19.40 | *** join/#tomcat michaelt (~chatzilla@www.scoplife.gr) |
13:31.22 | *** part/#tomcat michaelt (~chatzilla@www.scoplife.gr) |
14:25.48 | *** join/#tomcat andri (~andri@2001:7d0:0:10:202:a5ff:fe67:9c13) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
14:25.49 | *** join/#tomcat Jakdaw (1000@radar.wapmx.com) |
14:50.57 | *** join/#tomcat randrew (~raj@dolmen.cc.columbia.edu) |
15:01.06 | *** join/#tomcat JCScoobyRS (~JCScoobyR@65.116.245.5) |
15:01.22 | JCScoobyRS | Mornin all. |
15:01.40 | JCScoobyRS | I seem to have a problem with my Apache+Tomcat via mod_jk. |
15:02.09 | JCScoobyRS | If I try to access Apache from a remote machine, I can access it from it's IP address and it's computername or FQDN. |
15:03.35 | JCScoobyRS | When trying to access tomcat via mod_jk, I can only access the computer by the name in the workers.properties "worker.workername.host". For me to be able to serve all tomcat requests to tomcat, do I need a virtual host for each IP/Name I want tomcat to respond to or do I need to have multiple workers or a combination of both? |
15:04.17 | *** join/#tomcat marchy (~marchy@dsl-217-155-172-178.zen.co.uk) |
15:06.04 | marchy | hi all, i've got a question re precompiling jsp's: if i precompile jsp's, how can i get rid of the original source *.jsp's ? i.e. how do i tell tomcat to not even bother looking for jsp but go straignt to the class in the work dir? |
15:27.58 | *** join/#tomcat baer (~baer@d149195.upc-d.chello.nl) |
15:30.47 | *** join/#tomcat tang^ (~tang@d142-173-196-96.abhsia.telus.net) |
15:32.34 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: You have a sec? |
15:33.32 | tang^ | sure |
15:34.22 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: I have an Apache+Tomcat+SSL setup on a machine and when on that machine, I can access it via "localhost", "computername" and "192.168.1.5". |
15:35.30 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: I want to access it from other machines but when I do, it doesn't work from mod_jk. My question is do I need multiple workers for each IP/Name I want mod_jk to respond to or do I just need to use virtual hosts? |
15:37.11 | tang^ | accessing from other machines should work the same as from localhost |
15:38.12 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: Well, it's not and I've come to believe that it's mod_jk related. If I do "http://computername/tomcat-docs" so that it would be served from Tomcat via Apache, it doesn't work but if I do "http://computername:8080/tomcat-docs" bypassing mod_jk and Apache, it works. |
15:38.47 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: I later changed the name in workers.properties and in the httpd.conf to use the computername alone, instead of localhost, and I was then able to do http://computername/tomcat-docs and it worked fine. |
15:39.04 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: That's why I'm wondering if virutal host or multiple workers are needed or even both. |
15:41.46 | tang^ | did the apache logs show that it was attempting to forward the request to mod_jk? |
15:42.31 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: Never checked. I will do that when PHP is done installing. |
15:42.53 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: All I know is I get a "Page Cannot Be Displayed" 404 Error. |
15:43.35 | tang^ | the workers.properties just tells mod_jk where to look, it shouldn't affect where you call the page from |
15:51.49 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: So leaving that at localhost would be best yes? |
15:52.21 | tang^ | yeah, keeps the traffic between the two private |
15:52.49 | tang^ | using other than localhost would be for when apache and tomcat are on different servers |
15:58.20 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: Okay. Well, I still don't know why mod_jk only works when accessed from the localhost. |
15:59.02 | *** join/#tomcat nedim (~nedim@user-119b3g9.biz.mindspring.com) |
15:59.22 | *** join/#tomcat cilquirm (~cilq@65.246.162.129) |
16:04.27 | JCScoobyRS | !seen tang^ |
16:04.36 | JCScoobyRS | That didn't work. |
16:04.37 | JCScoobyRS | ;) |
16:04.43 | JCScoobyRS | Trying to see if I missed anything. |
16:05.05 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: When I get a chance to look at the logs, you just want me to see if Apache is sending the request from the remote host to mod_jk yes? |
16:06.29 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-070-194.arcor-ip.net) |
16:07.42 | *** join/#tomcat Sortova (~tarus@63.208.76.145) |
16:17.13 | *** join/#tomcat predictive (~pred@ip68-13-207-165.hr.hr.cox.net) |
16:17.43 | predictive | is there some temp dir other than work I am missing in 4.x? |
16:17.56 | predictive | you can delete the work dir entire and pages still run |
16:18.13 | predictive | it's spooky |
16:18.51 | *** join/#tomcat mod_cure (~Cure@cs666863-15.austin.rr.com) |
16:24.36 | predictive | i see plenty on lists and newsgroups about the problem |
16:24.41 | predictive | no solution however |
16:31.25 | *** part/#tomcat marchy (~marchy@dsl-217-155-172-178.zen.co.uk) |
16:36.10 | tang^ | predictive: maybe your browser is caching it? |
16:36.16 | predictive | oh no |
16:36.19 | predictive | this is a longstanding issue |
16:36.22 | predictive | its cool |
16:36.26 | predictive | i can delete the work dir |
16:36.30 | predictive | and the originial jsp |
16:36.35 | predictive | and it will still show |
16:36.43 | predictive | positive its not browser caching |
16:36.54 | predictive | other people have seen it too tho |
16:36.56 | tang^ | wierd. the webapp using caching? |
16:37.02 | predictive | no |
16:37.10 | predictive | yea it is weird |
16:37.30 | tang^ | at that point, I'd probably use the manager app to reload that particular webapp |
16:37.35 | predictive | yea |
16:37.43 | predictive | well shutting down tomcat usually handles it |
16:37.48 | predictive | but of course that sucks |
16:37.59 | tang^ | JCScoobyRS: yes, see if apache is logging the page request and attempting to send it to mod_jk |
16:38.09 | predictive | i havent found anything in the source yet that implies a cache |
16:38.16 | tang^ | predictive: which is why I'd use manager to just reload that one webapp |
16:38.25 | predictive | i hear you |
16:38.26 | predictive | same issue |
16:38.41 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: Well, it appears to be working properly now for some reason but only now that I have "gentoobox" as my Servername and worker.workername.host. |
16:38.45 | JCScoobyRS | I'll investigate. |
16:38.45 | tang^ | it still shows on a reload? |
16:38.59 | predictive | no |
16:39.23 | predictive | i meant that functionally there is no diff between shutting down tc and reloading since either way the webapp is unavailable |
16:39.29 | predictive | not really related |
16:39.34 | predictive | the best part is |
16:39.55 | predictive | at times when i see this behavior, you can rename a page to say jsp2.jsp |
16:40.06 | predictive | and then tomcat tells me that page doesnt exist |
16:40.11 | predictive | how cool is that! |
16:40.17 | predictive | ahahahaha |
16:40.20 | tang^ | well, unless your webapp takes a long time to reload, the end user shouldn't really notice it |
16:41.58 | tang^ | but you're right, it should not show pages that don't exist any more |
16:42.16 | predictive | or refuse to show pages that obviously exist |
16:42.16 | predictive | hehe |
16:42.22 | predictive | bah |
16:43.11 | tang^ | sounds like the autoload is disabled for that webapp |
16:43.14 | predictive | my client is dying to use websphere now |
16:43.22 | predictive | nope, on, checked it |
16:43.22 | predictive | but thanks |
16:43.41 | tang^ | which version tomcat? |
16:43.58 | predictive | 4.1.29 |
16:44.07 | predictive | jdk 1.4.2_01 on linux |
16:44.52 | tang^ | I'll make a note to try stuff out |
16:45.04 | predictive | oh, thx dont bother |
16:45.27 | tang^ | I'll bother because I'm curious |
16:45.27 | predictive | im tracing thru the jasper code to see if it does anything behind the scenes |
16:45.30 | predictive | ok |
16:45.33 | predictive | i just meant dont waste time on my account |
16:45.45 | tang^ | okay |
16:46.51 | predictive | but in case anyone ever asks you |
16:47.13 | predictive | we have reloadable on, cross context off, and are using a filestore to save sessions |
16:47.21 | predictive | none of those seem to affect it however |
16:47.29 | predictive | other than the obvious |
16:48.25 | hellabot | "nick" pasted "summary" at http://www.hellaweb.com/hellabot/110 |
16:57.11 | hellabot | "xD" pasted "brbrbr" at http://www.hellaweb.com/hellabot/113 |
17:15.58 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: ping |
17:23.40 | tang^ | y0 |
17:25.16 | JCScoobyRS | tang^: Can we go private for a minute? Quick question. |
17:26.25 | tang^ | sure |
17:26.54 | JCScoobyRS | Thanks. |
18:06.37 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-070-194.arcor-ip.net) |
18:31.00 | *** join/#tomcat rajatp (~rajatp@220.226.41.134) |
18:31.22 | rajatp | hello everyone |
18:35.59 | JCScoobyRS | Hello rajatp. |
18:42.49 | rajatp | what's latest |
18:43.21 | rajatp | ok a newbie question, i never got my tomcat running on alinux machine with the jdk 1.4.1 but the new jdk with netbeans got it running in a moment? |
18:43.44 | rajatp | do i need to do someting seperately to get the JVM running? |
18:44.47 | cilquirm | rajatp: that's quite the open ended question |
18:45.42 | rajatp | no seriously i never really though about what triggers the JVm to run. maybe becoz of my lack of knowledge |
18:45.43 | rajatp | but anyone? |
18:49.15 | JCScoobyRS | rajatp: What do you mean? |
18:55.05 | *** join/#tomcat p3 (~p3sulliva@pikes200.centura.org) |
18:55.52 | *** part/#tomcat p3 (~p3sulliva@pikes200.centura.org) |
19:06.18 | *** part/#tomcat predictive (~pred@ip68-13-207-165.hr.hr.cox.net) |
19:26.35 | *** join/#tomcat IRCMonkey (~chatzilla@amygdala.bic.uci.edu) |
19:59.12 | *** join/#tomcat jasonb_ (~jasonb@dsl017-050-098.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
20:35.23 | *** join/#tomcat {aaron} (~user@aeolus.cit.cornell.edu) |
20:35.32 | {aaron} | does craigmcc hang around here? |
20:37.21 | *** join/#tomcat IRCMonkey_ (~chatzilla@tpki33.toppoint.de) |
20:37.55 | {aaron} | anybody familiar with jakarta commons around here? |
20:38.11 | *** join/#tomcat klasstek (~peracles@c-67-162-134-148.client.comcast.net) |
20:38.57 | klasstek | hello |
20:40.25 | klasstek | I'm looking at installing dspace. Their recommended version of Tomcat is 4.0.6. They list a bug/feature of 4.1.12 that it does not follow symlinks. Is that repaird in 4.1.29? |
20:45.02 | tang^ | it's a security feature, not a bug |
20:45.27 | tang^ | the readme tells how to enable it if you really must follow symlinks |
20:46.31 | klasstek | ok... the bug was that it couldn't be disabled in 4.1.12 |
20:46.45 | klasstek | If it can be disabled in 4.1.29 then I'll give that a shot |
20:49.00 | {aaron} | it can be re-enabled, etc, i've tried it, it works |
20:49.36 | klasstek | ok thank you |
20:50.40 | *** join/#tomcat stratus (~stratus@200.198.184.97) |
21:01.58 | *** join/#tomcat schlumpf2 (~vx_schlum@dsl-082-082-070-194.arcor-ip.net) |
21:05.47 | *** part/#tomcat stratus (~stratus@200.198.184.97) |
23:01.52 | *** join/#tomcat p3 (~p3sulliva@pikes200.centura.org) |
23:03.44 | *** part/#tomcat p3 (~p3sulliva@pikes200.centura.org) |
23:30.59 | *** join/#tomcat Hegg (~hegg@166.70.168.214) |
23:31.09 | Hegg | greetings |
23:31.54 | Hegg | anyone good with Tomcat config that might be able to shed some light on IP address binding? |
23:53.21 | *** part/#tomcat JCScoobyRS (~JCScoobyR@65.116.245.5) |